Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below
Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
brief category:people
-entry for hyperlinking references at graph complex
brief category:people
-entry for hyperlinking references at fluid/gravity correspondence
brief category:people
-entry for hyperlinking references at fluid/gravity correspondence
brief category:people
-entry for hyperlinking references at fluid/gravity correspondence
stub for gradient flow
I started comma double category. Since I care about equipments more than double categories in general, and because it actually is an instance of a comma object, I made the article mostly about virtual double categories. I wrote down a couple of conjectures about when the comma has units and composites, but haven’t verified them yet and not sure when I will.
After this discussion at string diagrams for linearly distributive categories with unit = counit, I finally got round to having a go at making star-polycategory. Still much more to do. Hopefully I didn’t make any major mistakes so far.
brief category:people
-entry for hyperlinking references at Kazama-Suzuki model
brief category:people
entry for hyperlinking references at Kazama-Suzuki model
brief category:people
entry for hyperlinking references at Pontrjagin product
brief category:people
-entry for hyperlinking references at configuration space of points
brief category:people
-entry for hyperlinking references at configuration space of points
brief category:people
-entry for hyperlinking references at configuration spaces of points
I do think the phrasing “dense set (i.e. a countable intersection of dense opens)” was a bit confusing, since “i.e.” means “in other words”, but here it applies only to the immediately preceding words “ set” rather than the entire phrase “dense set”. So I changed it to “dense set (i.e. a countable intersection of dense opens that is itself dense)”.
brief category:people
-entry for hyperlinking references at knot theory, knot complement and maybe elsewhere
brief category:people
-entry for hyperlinking references at Cohomotopy
brief category:people
-entry for hyperlinking references at iterated loop space and at rational model of mapping spaces
brief category:people
-entry for hyperlinking references at rational model of mapping spaces
brief category:people
-entry for hyperlinking references at configuration space of points
brief category:people
-entry for hyperlinking references at graph complex
brief category:people
-entry for hyperlinking references at configuration space of points and graph complex
changed the content of this entry to a pointer to empty objects – contents
I’ve started ordinal analysis, mostly because I was beginning to forget a lot of what I once knew, and I had occasion to look into it again.
I mainly wanted to get the big table in there for future reference, but I tried to say few general remarks as well. I know there’s not much of an npov on ordinal analysis (yet), but it’s certainly of interest concerning strength of type theories for example.
I may try to fill in more explanations of undefined terms later, but I’m done for today.
I was thinking/hoping now that a general approach to perturbative QFT should exist, where all Feynman amplitudes are regarded not as singular distributions on , but as smooth differential forms on the FM-compactification of the configuration space of points. Mentioning this hunch to Igor Khavkine, he immediately recalled having heard Marko Berghoff speak about developing just that in his thesis Berghoff 14.
brief category:people
-entry for hyperlinking references at 3d-3d correspondence, volume conjecture and elsewhere
brief category:people
-entry for hyperlinking references at 4th generation of fermions
In the entry spacetime there used to be a subsection on the “hole argument”. It started out with Tim van Beek recalling the “hole paradox” and then continuing with me adding a lengthy discussion, with the result being an organizational mess as far as the poor entry that hosted it was concerned.
I have now moved that material into its own entry hole paradox, gave it a coherent and concise (I hope) idea-section, and cross-linked with general covariance.
The section “The hole argument” there is what Tim had originally written, I think, whereas the section Discussion is what I had added back then.
I am not claiming that that “discussion” of mine is necessarily particular well formulated, but I claim that it gets to the point.
Looking around I see that one finds the weirdest things being said about the “hole paradox”. For instance the first sentence this article here.
I am not proposing that we get into this. All I wanted to achieve here is to clean up the poor entry spacetime.
brief category:people
-entry for hyperlinking references at stable homotopy theory
I am planning to write a few things about Picard groupoids. For this purpose, I have removed a couple of redirects from Picard 2-group, added a new one which is a bit more precise, and tweaked the beginning of this page slightly. Feel free to edit further; I basically just wished to free up the page Picard groupoid.
some minimum, just so to have a canonical place for linking references jointly from LHC and flavour anomaly
brief note on Whitney extension theorem