Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below
Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
statement of the 3x3 lemma
Thanks to a Guest comment here I looked at this page for essentially the first time, and realized that it’s one more thing that’s naturally done in linear constructive mathematics (“complemented subsets” or “disjoint pairs” are the elements of the linear powerset).
One question: this page says that the disjoint pairs form a “Boolean rig”, but that doesn’t seem right to me. A Boolean rig would, I presume, lack a negation operation entirely; but here we do have an involutive “negation” even though it’s not the “additive inverse”. I would say that the disjoint pairs form a De Morgan algebra, and in fact more generally a -autonomous lattice. Am I misinterpreting the intended meaning of “Boolean rig”?
Also, what is the “Handbook of Constructive Analysis” referred to (as a graylink from Bishop \& Bridges)? I can’t find it on google.
added pointer to the original
brief category:people
-entry for hyperlinking references at super Poincaré Lie algebra and supersymmetry
brief category:people
-entry for hypoerlinking references at super Poincaré Lie algebra and supersymmetry
have added a minimum on the level decompositon of the first fundamental rep of here.
for completeness, I have splitt off superstring from string
Stub to satisfy a link from arity space.
added mentioning of the -angle in AdS/QCD models being the graviphoton in the higher WZW-term of the D4-brane, with pointer to today’s
and cross-linked with other relevant entries
A stub. for the moment just so as to record these pointers:
Alexey Petrov, Searching for New Physics with Charm (arXiv:1003.0906)
Alexey Petrov, Theory of rare charm decays into leptons (arXiv:1704.03862)
I have added to the References at double negation pointer to Andrej’s exposition:
which is really good. I have also added this to double negation transformation, but clearly that entry needs some real references, too.
Created page about Novikov fields, another kind of generalized power series field. I’m looking for a good notation for these along the lines of for power series rings, for Laurent series fields, for Hahn series fields; the only notation in the literature seems to be , which doesn’t suggest its meaning to me and clashes with exterior algebras.
I just noticed this page. Is it really worth having separately from essentially small category (which redirects to small category)?
added these pointers
Discussion of quantum anomaly cancellation and 7d Horava-Witten theory is in
{#GherghettaKehagias02} Tony Gherghetta, Alex Kehagias, Anomaly Cancellation in Seven-Dimensional Supergravity with a Boundary, Phys.Rev. D68 (2003), 065019, (arXiv:hep-th/0212060)
Spyros D. Avramis, Alex Kehagias, _Gauged Supergravity on the Orbifold (arXiv:hep-th/0407221)
T.G. Pugh, Ergin Sezgin, Kellogg Stelle, / Heterotic Supergravity with Gauged R-Symmetry (arXiv:1008.0726)
Someone anonymous (probably from Gottingen) had changed simplicial homotopy. The old version seems to have had a different convention on the ordeing of the parts which was not ’wrong’ but was slightly different from some sources. I have added a note to the entry pointing out the existence of different conventions, and have cleaned up the use of instead of the more usual in that entry.
I checked back in the linked entry simplex, there, and found that the entry was a bit confusing as to the simplicial set . I have altered the structure and wording slightly to clarify things (I hope).
I put in a reference to Lurie’s course on Tamagawa numbers at Ran space.
I have finally given the previous stub-entry 2d (2,0)-superconformal QFT some genuine content, also added more citations with brief comments on what they are about.
Also cross-linked with and added related brief paragraphs to Calabi-Yau manifolds and supersymmetry, heterotic string.
brief category:people
-entry for hyperlinking references at intersecting D-brane model, Yukawa-couplings and maybe elsewhere
In the spirit of yesterday’s discussion about applied topics on the nLab, I have begun creating an article for game theory. The page previously existed just as a list of references, but there doesn’t seem to be an nForum thread about it.
added to measure space a link to measurable locale.
In the course I notice the following remnant discussion, which hereby I move from there to here
Eric: Some day this should hopefully tie into the beautiful stuff on Leinster measure (blog).
+– {: .query} Eric: is also the exterior derivative and is a volume form. Is there a nice way to say this that is consistent with the above? Update: The Usenet discussion probably discusses this, but I’m too lazy to read the whole thing right now (past my bedtime!).
Toby: As a volume form is not, in general, the exterior derivative of anything, you cannot interpret the ‘’ in (eq:excessive) as an exterior derivative. You can do this for the ‘’ in (eq:Leibniz), of course, because that is on the real line, where the volume form is the exterior derivative of the identity function . But in general, an absolutely continuous Radon measure on an oriented smooth -dimensional manifold defines an -form on (and vice versa), so if you call the form as well, then you want to use (eq:simple). (The exterior deriviative of the volume form, of course, would be zero!)
I'm actually halfway through writing an article differential form where I will address some of this. (I guess that I'm going through old Usenet posts of mine; I am using the conversation that you and I had with John in this old thread as reference for some of it!)
Eric: I look forward to it! By the way, that Usenet discussion was a nice blast from the past :)
Eric: I put some comments about that discussion here.
Toby: I should note that, even given what I wrote above, there is still a slight clash of notation between measure theory and differential topology. To fix this, the in (eq:full) could be replaced with . This has to do with the whole the-absolute-value-of-an-form-is-an-pseudoform and integration-of-pseudoforms-is-more-fundamental-than-integration-of-forms issue. I referred to this clash of notation in our Usenet conversation here.
Eric: It’s starting to come back to me now. Yeah, the measure is really a pseudo -form and we settled on the notation for that. We should at least give a nod to that idea I think in the above.
Gave an explicit definition as the quotient ring , and mentioned the equivalent definition in terms of multiplicative systems. Gave the example of Laurent polynomials. The explicit definition was already given at localisation of a commutative ring, but the multiplicative system was not given, and I think the construction is fundamental enough to warrant its own page. I will tweak localisation of a commutative ring to link to the new page.
added hyperlinks, formatting, toc.
Somebody should create an entry for decidable set
Added formatting, hyperlinks, toc and floating-toc.
But mainly I came here to see if decidable inclusion should redirect here (which is now required at constructive model structure on simplicial sets). I have made it a redirect, but there is much room in this and related entries for experts to live out their expertise
I am writing an exposition (or a dictionary) integral transforms on sheaves.
Check it out. I will have to go offline soon. Maybe somebody feels like further polishing/expanding this up a bit. Then later I want to supply that for the current Café discussion.
a minimum, in order to satisfy a link that got demanded at constructive model structure on simplicial sets
brief category:people
-entry for hyperlinking references at hypergraph category
a stub, on occasion of today’s
and to provide the previously missing link at flavour anomaly for
added references:
Discussion in heterotic M-theory aka Horava-Witten theory, where the two heterotic MO9-branes provide a natural mechanism for supersymmetry breaking on one (the physical brane) by gaugino condensation on the other (the “dark sector” brane):
lecture notes:
original articles:
I. Antoniadis, M. Quiros, On the M-theory description of gaugino condensation, Phys.Lett. B416 (1998) 327-333 (arXiv:hep-th/9707208)
I. Antoniadis, M. Quiros, Supersymmetry breaking in M-theory and gaugino condensation, Nucl.Phys. B505 (1997) 109-122 (arXiv:hep-th/9705037)
André Lukas, Burt Ovrut, Daniel Waldram, Gaugino condensation in M theory on , Phys. Rev. D 57, 7529 (1998) (arXiv:hep-th/9711197, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.57.7529)
André Lukas, Burt Ovrut, Daniel Waldram, Five-Branes and Supersymmetry Breaking in M-Theory, JHEP 9904:009, 1999 (arXiv:hep-th/9901017)
specifically for M-theory on S1/G_HW times H/G_ADE:
brief catyegory:people
-entry for hyperlinking references at M-theory on S1/G_HW times H/G_ADE and at NS5-brane and maybe elsewhere
brief category:people
-entry for hyperlinking references at JT gravity and random matrix theory
a new item in the list experiments – contents, in order to give a home to this reference on observation of spinning black holes (near-extremal):
Xinyu Dai, Shaun Steele, Eduardo Guerras, Christopher W. Morgan, Bin Chen, Constraining Quasar Relativistic Reflection Regions and Spins with Microlensing (arXiv:1901.06007)
exposition in:
Chandra Observatory, Chandra Views Spinning Black Holes Across Cosmic Sea, July 5 2019
brief category:people
-entry for hyperlinking references at sphere packing and weak gravity conjecture
brief category:people
-entry for hyperlinking references at sphere packing and weak gravity conjecture.