Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf sheaves simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
  1. Decidable language =/= decidable type checking.

    Arvid Marx

    diff, v23, current

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeDec 22nd 2019

    I don’t think I even know what a “decidable language” is. Do you mean decidability of type inhabitation?

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorGuest
    • CommentTimeJan 6th 2020
    Yes, that's what I meant in this case, and it read like this was the intended meaning despite very obviously being wrong.

    -- Arvid Marx
    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMay 13th 2021
    • (edited May 13th 2021)

    added pointer to:

    diff, v24, current

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthornLab edit announcer
    • CommentTimeAug 31st 2022
    • (edited Oct 17th 2022 by Christian Sattler)

    Adding XTT as an example of an extensional cubical type theory, and adding a paper where XTT was defined as a reference:

    Anonymous

    diff, v26, current

  2. adding reference

    Anonymous

    diff, v27, current

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeSep 1st 2022

    Added explanation of why “extensional”.

    diff, v28, current

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeSep 1st 2022

    I would kind of like to split this page into “extensional type theory”, referring only to the historically accurate definitionally extensional type theory, and another page called something like “set-level type theory” that includes also the so-called “propositionally extensional” type theories like MLTT+UIP, Agda-with-K, OTT, and XTT. I think the expansion of the meaning of “extensional type theory” to the latter class was a mistake and we should try to fix it. We probably can’t immediately fix all the pages that use that terminology, but we can make a note at “extensional type theory” that you might have meant “set-level type theory” and fix them as we find them.

    Thoughts?

    • CommentRowNumber9.
    • CommentAuthorjonsterling
    • CommentTimeSep 1st 2022

    I strongly agree.

    • CommentRowNumber10.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeSep 3rd 2022

    An anonymous contributor created set-level type theory. Since no one seems to be objecting, we can move anything relevant from this page over there and refocus it on the definitionally-extensional sort.

    • CommentRowNumber11.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeSep 4th 2022

    Removed set-level type theory material. This page is now only about definitionally extensional type theories.

    diff, v30, current