Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Discussion Tag Cloud

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorzskoda
    • CommentTimeJun 5th 2011

    Article page (unfinished but already has a sensible story) Reconstruction of Groups.

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJun 5th 2011

    I have added links to that page from “Tannaka duality” and “Tannaka-Krein theorem”

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorzskoda
    • CommentTimeJun 5th 2011

    Notice an interesting discussion at the beginning of the paper on the relation between the functional analysis picture and algebraic geometry:

    Note that the Tannaka–Krein duality reflects the fact that any compact group is the set of real points of an affine pro-algebraic group (‘pro-’ stands for projective limit). This observation had lead to an extension of Tannaka–Krein duality to pro-algebraic groups ([D], [DM], [R1], [S]) and Lie algebras ([H-C], [R1]).

    Continuous finite-dimensional representations of compact groups are rigid in the following sense: every subcategory of the category f.Rep(G)f. Rep(G) of finite-dimensional representations of a compact group GG, which separates elements of GG and is closed under the tensor product and complex conjugation, is naturally equivalent to the category f.Rep(G)f. Rep(G) itself. This is a consequence of a similar rigidity property of regular representations of affine pro-algebraic groups. It follows from the results of this paper that infinite-dimensional representations of an arbitrary locally compact or Lie group do not possess the rigidity property.