Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf sheaves simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeJun 17th 2011
   • (edited Jun 17th 2011)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexI am about to write something at [[jet bundle]] and elsewhere about the general abstract perspective. In chapter 2 of Beilinson-Drinfeld's [[Chiral Algebra]]s they have the nice characterization of the Jet bundle functor as the right adjoint to the forgetful functor $F : Scheme_{\mathcal{D}}(X) \to Scheme(X)$ from [[D-scheme]]s over $X$ to just schemes over $X$. Now, since D-modules on $X$ are quasicoherent modules on the [[de Rham space]] $\Pi_{inf}(X)$, I guess we can identify $$ Scheme_{\mathcal{D}}(X) $$ with $$ Schemes/\Pi_{inf}(X) $$ and hence the forgetful functor above is the pullback functor $$ \array{ F(E) &\to& E \\ \downarrow && \downarrow \\ X &\to& \Pi_{inf}(X) } $$ aling the lower canonical morphism ("constant infinitesimal path inclusion"). This would mean that we have the following nice general abstract characterization of jet bundles: let $\mathbf{H}$ be a [[cohesive (infinity,1)-topos]] equipped with [[infinitesimal cohesion]] $\mathbf{H} \hookrightarrow \mathbf{H}_{th}$. For any $X \in \mathbf{X}$ we then have the canonical morphism $i : X \to \mathbf{\Pi}_{inf}(X)$. The **Jet bundle functor** is then simply the corresponding [[base change geometric morphism]] $$ Jet := (i^* \dashv i_*) : \mathbf{H}/X \to \mathbf{H}/\mathbf{\Pi}(X) $$ or rather, if we forget the $\mathcal{D}$-module structure on the coherent sheaves on the jet bundle, it is the comonad $i^* i_*$ induced by that. Does that way of saying it ring a bell with anyone?

   I am about to write something at jet bundle and elsewhere about the general abstract perspective.

   In chapter 2 of Beilinson-Drinfeld’s Chiral Algebras they have the nice characterization of the Jet bundle functor as the right adjoint to the forgetful functor $F : Scheme_{\mathcal{D}}(X) \to Scheme(X)$ from D-schemes over $X$ to just schemes over $X$.

   Now, since D-modules on $X$ are quasicoherent modules on the de Rham space $\Pi_{inf}(X)$, I guess we can identify

   $$Scheme_{\mathcal{D}}(X)$$

   with

   $$Schemes/\Pi_{inf}(X)$$

   and hence the forgetful functor above is the pullback functor

   $$\array{ F(E) &\to& E \\ \downarrow && \downarrow \\ X &\to& \Pi_{inf}(X) }$$

   aling the lower canonical morphism (“constant infinitesimal path inclusion”).

   This would mean that we have the following nice general abstract characterization of jet bundles:

   let $\mathbf{H}$ be a cohesive (infinity,1)-topos equipped with infinitesimal cohesion $\mathbf{H} \hookrightarrow \mathbf{H}_{th}$. For any $X \in \mathbf{X}$ we then have the canonical morphism $i : X \to \mathbf{\Pi}_{inf}(X)$.

   The Jet bundle functor is then simply the corresponding base change geometric morphism

   $$Jet := (i^* \dashv i_*) : \mathbf{H}/X \to \mathbf{H}/\mathbf{\Pi}(X)$$

   or rather, if we forget the $\mathcal{D}$-module structure on the coherent sheaves on the jet bundle, it is the comonad $i^* i_*$ induced by that.

   Does that way of saying it ring a bell with anyone?

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeJun 17th 2011
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexSorry, the math does not display.

   Sorry, the math does not display.