Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeMay 2nd 2013
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexwrote something at _[[cosmic string]]_ and by copy-and-pasting-and-changing-the-degrees added something similar to _[[domain wall]]_ and _[[monopole]]_. Needs a bit more polishing, maybe. I am really working on writing out an abstract re-formulation of this classical theory in terms of [[extended TQFT]] [[QFT with defects|with defects]], but not done with that yet (and will probably be interrupted again before finishing it).

   wrote something at cosmic string and by copy-and-pasting-and-changing-the-degrees added something similar to domain wall and monopole. Needs a bit more polishing, maybe.

   I am really working on writing out an abstract re-formulation of this classical theory in terms of extended TQFT with defects, but not done with that yet (and will probably be interrupted again before finishing it).

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeMay 13th 2013
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexsome basic text at _[magnetic monopole](http://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/monopole#MagneticMonopoles)_, written to accompany what I really wanted to add: a new phenomenological [citation](http://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/monopole#ChoKimYoon13)

   some basic text at magnetic monopole, written to accompany what I really wanted to add: a new phenomenological citation

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeMay 13th 2013
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexHm, I should rather have written a paragraph about [electroweak monopoles](http://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/monopole#ElectroweakMonopoles). And so I did now.

   Hm, I should rather have written a paragraph about electroweak monopoles. And so I did now.