Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf sheaves simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeDec 10th 2009

    added to (infinity,1)-operad the definition/proposition of the model structure for the category of (oo,1)-categories of operations here

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
    • CommentTimeDec 10th 2009

    The table of contents seemed mixed up there, so I tried to fix it.

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeDec 11th 2009
    • (edited Dec 11th 2009)

    added a section

    at (infinity,1)-operad where I give some definition/proposition/proof, as far as I think I can see, of aspects of what is expected to be a Quillen equivalence between the Cisinski-Moerdijk-Weiss-model and the Lurie-model of (oo,1)-operads.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeDec 11th 2009

    In that context I added to spine the definition for dendroidal sets.

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeDec 11th 2009
    • (edited Dec 11th 2009)

    I further strengthened the statement (and proof) of the theorem about the Relation between the two definitions at (infinity,1)-operad.

    Now I have almost that the dendroidal nerve from the Lurie-model to the Cisinski-Moerdijk-Weiss model is the right adjoint of a Quillen adjunction, except that I currently only know that the left adjoint has the required respect for acylic cofibrations only for cofibrant domains. I'll think about getting rid of that condition...

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeDec 11th 2009

    ahm, or maybe not. There is a gap in my argument. I have briefly indicated this in the proof for the moment, but need to leave it at that for the time being, as I have to go offline now. More later.