Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics comma complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration finite foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeNov 30th 2015

    The FAQ says under the heading “My LaTeX produces gobbledygook in iTeX and vice versa” that

    $t^3,2$ renders as t 3,2t^3,2 instead of t 3,2t^{3},2

    but to me, both renderings look the same, with the “,2” outside the superscript. Has iTeX changed since this FAQ was written?

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
    • CommentTimeNov 30th 2015

    Perhaps, or perhaps it was supposed to be a period all along: t 3.2t^3.2.

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeNov 30th 2015

    I think the surrounding text makes it clear that it was supposed to be a comma.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
    • CommentTimeDec 7th 2015

    The text makes it clear that it was expected to work with either. I don't know if it ever did work with either, and if so, for which versions of iTeX.

    I've changed the example to use a period, so that it works, with a comment about how strange it is that the comma behaves differently now.

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
    • CommentTimeDec 7th 2015

    There appears to be another change; the last item under gobbledygook claims that $\text{∞}$ shouldn't parse, but it does. (There's even a helpful example to show that the text is wrong!) I can rewrite that, but I thought that I'd point it out first.