Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics comma complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration finite foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeJul 1st 2017

    I added to walking structure a 2-categorical theorem that implies that usually “the underlying X of the walking X is the initial X”. This fact seems like it should be well-known, but I don’t offhand know a reference for it, can anyone give a pointer?

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorPeter Heinig
    • CommentTimeJul 1st 2017
    • (edited Jul 1st 2017)

    Unsure whether this is any help, but similar in spirit seem some characterizations of indiscrete categories. Internal pointer: indiscrete category, Section 2. External pointer: e.g. page 13 in pdf of this talk: http://benedikt-ahrens.de/talks/Fields_HoTT_2016.pdf.

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeJul 1st 2017

    I don’t see any relationship.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeFeb 19th 2018

    I realized that the above claim that “the underlying X of the walking X is the initial X” was a little overbroad; the situation is a bit subtler than that. The problem is that the “underlying set” functor C(I,)C(I,-) of a monoidal category is in general only lax monoidal, whereas the universal property of a “walking X qua monoidal category” is relative to strong monoidal functors. The argument works much better for things like categories with products, where the relevant categorical structure is preserved by the “underlying set” functor C(1,)C(1,-). I think we can conclude things about some walking Xs qua monoidal category, by applying the argument to multicategories instead and using the fact that a multicategory embeds fully-faithfully in the monoidal category that it freely generates (since if X is something that makes sense in a multicategory, then the walking X qua monoidal category is the free monoidal category generate by the walking X qua multicategory). But for other walking Xs qua monoidal category the claim doesn’t even make sense. I’ve updated the page walking structure with this.

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorvarkor
    • CommentTimeMay 8th 2020

    Add reference to “free-living” as an alternative phrase.

    diff, v18, current

  1. Adding the interval groupoid as the walking isomorphism (page to be created).

    diff, v19, current

  2. Adding walking equivalence as an example.

    diff, v20, current

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorDmitri Pavlov
    • CommentTimeJul 4th 2020

    Walking adjunction.

    diff, v21, current

    • CommentRowNumber9.
    • CommentAuthorvarkor
    • CommentTimeDec 10th 2023

    Added a reference for the terminology “free-living”.

    diff, v23, current