Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below
Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
for hyperlinking references at false vacuum
since I was looking at Bunge-Funk I wrote a short note at cosheaf.
Added the definition of “basic triples” of octonions, and the statement that they form a torsor over .
Added link to finite étale morphism of anabelioids.
with the URL code for Relay Station, useful for linking from $n$lab
added a paragraph on extremality and spinning black hole formation (taken from a Phyiscs.SE comment, linked to) to Kerr spacetime.
(Needs more formatting, but I have to run now.)
a stub, right now just to satisfy links at classical double copy
I created Lawvere distribution. I decided to formulate it directly in the -topos setup, because
there the analogy with distributions makes (even) better sense, as we can invoke -groupoid cardinality to think of (tame) -sheaves as -valued functions;
it reproduces then a special case of the discussion at Pr(∞,1)Cat and harmonizes with the interpretation in terms of -vector spaces as described there.
Created hypergraph category.
brief category:people
-entry for hyperlinking references at hadron supersymmetry
brief category:people
-entry for hyperlinking references at hadron supersymmetry
brief category:peopke
-entry for hyperlinking references at hadron supersymmetry
brief category:people
-entry for hyperlinking references at hadron supersymmetry
brief category:people
-entry for hyperlinking references at hadron supersymmetry
brief ‘category:people’-entry for hyperlinking references at hadron supersymmetry
brief category:people
-entry for hyperlinking references at hadron supersymmetry
brief category:people
-entry for hyperlinking references at hadron supersymmetry and at supersymmetry
Hello all, I was wondering if one or two of you would be able to find the time to see if you think that the arguments on the following page, on my personal web, are correct? There are so many sharp minds amongst the readership here, that I’m sure if there is an error, one of you will make short work of finding it!
Observations on prime divisors of odd integers in a range (richardwilliamson)
With these kinds of elementary arguments, everything has to be exactly right; the entire argument is likely to collapse if the smallest detail is wrong. Thus, though I have checked the argument several times myself, including after having slept on it, it is eminently possible that I have overlooked something, so do read with a critical eye :-).
I am also thinking of making a little page, for completeness, on Bertrand’s postulate, on the main nLab, which I can link to in my argument. Would this be OK (I ask because I don’t know any category theoretic point of view on it at all)?
Any feedback will be greatly appreciated!
I have added some first content to generalized Reedy model structure.
brief category:people
-entry for hyperlinking references at false vacuum eternal inflation