Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below
Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
starting something. For the moment just checking what literature exists. So far I am aware of this:
Andrew Baker, Some chromatic phenomena in the homotopy of , in: N. Ray, G. Walker (eds.), Adams Memorial Symposium on Algebraic Topology, Vol. 2 editors, Cambridge University Press (1992), 263–80 (pdf, BakerMSp.pdf:file)
Ivan Panin, Charles Walter, Quaternionic Grassmannians and Pontryagin classes in algebraic geometry (hal:00531725, pdf)
Ivan Panin, Charles Walter, Quaternionic Grassmannians and Borel classes in algebraic geometry (arXiv:1011.0649)
Ivan Panin, Oriented theories and symplectic cobordism, Seminar
added doi for
started something at splitting principle
(wanted to do more, but need to interrupt now)
added a tiny bit of basics to complex oriented cohomology theory
added ISBN:9780080571751
brief category:people-entry for hyperlinking references at conformal bootstrap
brief category:people-entry for hyperlinking references at conformal bootstrap
added pointers:
For superconformal field theory, such as D=4 N=1 SYM, D=4 N=2 SYM, D=4 N=4 SYM, D=6 N=(1,0) SCFT, D=6 N=(2,0) SCFT:
Christopher Beem, Madalena Lemos, Pedro Liendo, Leonardo Rastelli, Balt C. van Rees, The superconformal bootstrap (arXiv:1412.7541)
Christopher Beem, Madalena Lemos, Leonardo Rastelli, Balt C. van Rees, The superconformal bootstrap (arXiv:1507.05637)
Christopher Beem, Leonardo Rastelli, Balt C. van Rees, More superconformal bootstrap (arXiv:1612.02363)
this is a bare list of references, to be !include-ed into relevant entries (such as D-brane, Dirac charge quantization and D-brane charge quantization in K-theory).
In fact, the list is that which has been in each of these entries all along, and it has been a pain to synchronize the parallel lists. So this here now to ease the process.
Sen’s conjecture (and a stub for D25-brane)
(to go with this physics.SE discussion)
started an entry Planck’s constant with a remark on its meaning from the point of view of geometric quantization (and nothing else, so far).
Started arithmetic topology.
created a minimum at projective bundle
As written, I do not believe Theorem 4.1 is true. Certainly, the coreflection exists but it is unclear why the topology generated by the connected components of the open subsets of is in fact a locally connected space. It is only obvious that locally connected spaces are the fixed points of this construction. Either this case was being mistaken for the locally path-connected case or the mistake was made of assuming that connected subspaces of still need to be connected as subspaces of . Looking at the literature (Gleason’s paper “Universally locally connected refinements”) this simple refinement is used to show that the coreflection exists. However, the simple refinement and coreflection don’t seem to be the same. Rather, the coreflection is only guaranteed to be the infimum (in the lattice of topologies) of locally connected topologies larger than the topology of .
Jeremy Brazas
added to Grothendieck construction a section Adjoints to the Grothendieck construction
There I talk about the left adjoint to the Grothendieck construction the way it is traditionally written in the literature, and then make a remark on how one can look at this from a slightly different perspective, which then is the perspective that seamlessly leads over to Lurie's realization of the (oo,1)-Grothendieck construction.
There is a CLAIM there which is maybe not entirely obvious, but straightforward to check. I'll provide the proof later.
Someone anonymous has noted that the labels in two diagrams in triangle identities are misplaced. This seems clear. As the diagrams are external, can someone edit them who has access to the original code? There seem to be other errors (e.g. a C should be a D), as well.
added this item to the list:
added pointer to:
Also added more items under “Selected writings”