Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).

nLab > Latest Changes: Cheng space

Bottom of Page

1 to 6 of 6

  1.  
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeJul 31st 2019

    Thanks to a Guest comment here I looked at this page for essentially the first time, and realized that it’s one more thing that’s naturally done in linear constructive mathematics (“complemented subsets” or “disjoint pairs” are the elements of the linear powerset).

    One question: this page says that the disjoint pairs form a “Boolean rig”, but that doesn’t seem right to me. A Boolean rig would, I presume, lack a negation operation entirely; but here we do have an involutive “negation” even though it’s not the “additive inverse”. I would say that the disjoint pairs form a De Morgan algebra, and in fact more generally a *\ast-autonomous lattice. Am I misinterpreting the intended meaning of “Boolean rig”?

    Also, what is the “Handbook of Constructive Analysis” referred to (as a graylink from Bishop \& Bridges)? I can’t find it on google.

    diff, v4, current

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorRodMcGuire
    • CommentTimeAug 1st 2019

    Also, what is the “Handbook of Constructive Analysis” referred to (as a graylink from Bishop \& Bridges)? I can’t find it on google.

    Where are you getting that title from?

    I presume the referernce is just to

    Bishop, Errett and Douglas Bridges, 1985. Constructive Analysis. New York: Springer. ISBN 0-387-15066-8.

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeAug 1st 2019

    Second paragraph of the idea section of the page:

    Some of the [[abstract nonsense]] below is original research (by [[Toby Bartels]] and [[Todd Trimble]]), but based heavily on Cheng\'s work as described in [[Handbook of Constructive Analysis|Bishop & Bridges]].

  4. I added the reference to the Bishop & Bridges textbook mentioned in the introduction of this article.

    diff, v5, current

  5. I also added the Bishop Cheng textbook on constructive measure theory to the references.

    diff, v5, current

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
    • CommentTimeAug 25th 2024

    Sorry Mike, that should have been ‘Foundation’, not ‘Handbook’. (Although strictly speaking, ‘Foundation’ is only in the title of the first edition, by Bishop alone; Bridges shortened the title for the revised edition, which is the one that includes the material by Cheng.)

    Madeleine (who brought this to my attention) has already fixed the article; thanks, Madeleine.

1 to 6 of 6

  1.