Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).

nLab > Latest Changes: enriched monad

Bottom of Page

1 to 14 of 14

  1.  
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorSam Staton
    • CommentTimeAug 14th 2019

    expand with definition

    diff, v3, current

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeAug 15th 2019

    So, for some examples, closure operators for 2\mathbf{2}, presumably. Anything interesting for metric spaces?

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorSam Staton
    • CommentTimeAug 15th 2019

    reference

    diff, v4, current

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorSam Staton
    • CommentTimeAug 15th 2019
    • (edited Aug 15th 2019)
    Yes, closure operators would be an example, and I notice that the Kleisli presentation is indeed a known slick way of describing closure operators, which is quite nice. Not sure about the metric example, good question. What role do adjunctions play in the metric setting? Sorry if I have forgotten.

    Another example is that people often use cpo-enriched monads in CS for the semantics of iteration.
    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeAug 15th 2019

    Added the example of closure operator, and linked to enriched adjunction.

    diff, v5, current

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeAug 19th 2019

    Is there a standard reference for the enriched version of things like Kleisli, Eilenberg-Moore categories, monads as lax 2-functors etc.?

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeAug 20th 2019

    Well, from one perspective there’s not much to say, since VCatV Cat is a 2-category and all of that is 2-categorical abstract nonsense. But I think there’s some particular discussion of enriched monads in Dubuc’s book Kan Extensions in Enriched Category Theory.

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeAug 20th 2019

    Thanks!

    diff, v7, current

  9. remove redundant ZZ in definition.

    Sandro Stucki

    diff, v9, current

    • CommentRowNumber10.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeAug 22nd 2023

    made explicit all the tacit assumptions in the definition

    While I was at it, I adjusted wording throughout,

    and gave some paragraphs to the Idea-section

    diff, v10, current

    • CommentRowNumber11.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeAug 22nd 2023
    • (edited Aug 22nd 2023)

    Incidentally, the references previously provided in the entry seem to have little relation to the current content of the entry. Or else it’s hard to spot.

    I have added pointer to:

    where the explicit definition of enriched monads in Kleisli form is Def. 5.6.

    (It’s not a priori clear that their definition – which is the obvious one – is equivalent to the one in the entry: The entry requires the structural equations to be satisfied on global elements only. Is this intentional?)

    [edit: Hm, since the equations appear in revision 3 without any typing, they are probably meant to apply to generalized elements. I’ll edit accordingly, but need to interrupt for the moment…]

    diff, v12, current

    • CommentRowNumber12.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeAug 22nd 2023

    have added the missing diagrams to the definition

    diff, v13, current

    • CommentRowNumber13.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeAug 22nd 2023

    expanded on the statement of the relation between enriched and strong monads and added a reference (here)

    Since this statement is being alluded to in various other entries, I am thinking of making this an !include section

    relation between strong and enriched functors and monads – section

    Not now, but maybe tomorrow…

    diff, v13, current

    • CommentRowNumber14.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeAug 23rd 2023

    added pointer to

    which has a detailed account of the relation enriched/strong/monoidal monads.

    diff, v16, current

1 to 14 of 14

  1.