Not signed in (Sign In)

Start a new discussion

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry bundles calculus categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-theory cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics comma complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science connection constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundations functional-analysis functor galois-theory gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry goodwillie-calculus graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory history homological homological-algebra homology homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie lie-theory limit limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal-logic model model-category-theory monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nonassociative noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pasting philosophy physics planar pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory subobject superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorzskoda
    • CommentTimeApr 7th 2010

    algebrad and additions at Nikolai Durov. The movie starts slow and boring but gets very interesting after a while when the topic develops.

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorzskoda
    • CommentTimeApr 7th 2010

    I added the abstract and its translation. Unfortunately, the time limitation made him cut from the most interesting part.

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
    • CommentTimeApr 7th 2010

    Added query at algebrad.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeApr 7th 2010

    I guess that's what it must mean, yes.

    I added some hyperlinks.

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorzskoda
    • CommentTimeApr 7th 2010

    Look at the video yourself, I may have misunderstood the point.

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorzskoda
    • CommentTimeApr 8th 2010

    Mike posted a very useful comment. I hope people will gradually extract more definitions from the video.

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorzskoda
    • CommentTimeApr 11th 2010

    I corrected slightly the entry.

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorzskoda
    • CommentTimeApr 11th 2010

    More corrections.

    • CommentRowNumber9.
    • CommentAuthorzskoda
    • CommentTimeJan 7th 2011

    I read more of the manuscript of Durov in Russian recently. I have an impression (I am in a hurry right now, but hope to be able to explain that soon) that the fact that the algebrads, i.e. monads in the 2-category of vectoids generalize symmetric operads, non-sigma operads and alike is sort of a manifestation of an idea which is very close in spirit to John Baez’s microcosmos-macrocosmos principle. Namely, one uses the cocontinuity of the functor and aprpopriate completeness axiom to get that classification of an object with some kind of structure is reflected in the structure of finite approximations which determine the algebrad. This way one gets series of operations, satisfying some relations, depending which kind of algebaric structures the vectoid classifies. To say it differently, the main examples come from classifying vectoids, they typically classify objects with certain structure. Then the endocell respects this and reads the finite-level structure from there. This gives a combinatorics similar to the combinatorics of operads (category of species for example is an intermediate step in the case of usual operads which come from a classifier for objects).

    • CommentRowNumber10.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeJan 13th 2011

    Interesting. What is gained by working with vectoids rather than, say, locally presentable categories? Are there important vectoids that are not locally presentable?

    • CommentRowNumber11.
    • CommentAuthorzskoda
    • CommentTimeJan 14th 2011

    Right, this is a good question and I was just trying last about a week to equip myself with understanding of such variants. Hopefully I will be able to answer your question soon.

Add your comments
  • Please log in or leave your comment as a "guest post". If commenting as a "guest", please include your name in the message as a courtesy. Note: only certain categories allow guest posts.
  • To produce a hyperlink to an nLab entry, simply put double square brackets around its name, e.g. [[category]]. To use (La)TeX mathematics in your post, make sure Markdown+Itex is selected below and put your mathematics between dollar signs as usual. Only a subset of the usual TeX math commands are accepted: see here for a list.

  • (Help)