Not signed in (Sign In)

Start a new discussion

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration finite foundations functional-analysis functor galois-theory gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie lie-theory limit limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic manifolds mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeNov 25th 2019
    • (edited Nov 25th 2019)

    starting something, in order to record Theorem 4.2 in

    But HELP: The article states this without proof. I understand how the discussion here and in the other articles now cited in the entry goes towards the proof, but I’d really like to see the actual proof written out. Eventually.

    v1, current

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeNov 26th 2019
    • (edited Nov 26th 2019)

    added statement of the stronger version of the theorem, for horizontal chord diagrams (Theorem 4.1 in Kohno 02 )

    H (ΩConf {1,,n}( 3))(𝒲 n pb) Gr (𝒱 n pb). H \mathbb{Z}^\bullet \big( \Omega \underset{ {}^{\{1,\cdots,n\}} }{Conf} (\mathbb{R}^3) \big) \;\simeq\; (\mathcal{W}^{pb}_n)^\bullet \;\simeq\; Gr^\bullet( \mathcal{V}^{pb}_n ) \,.

    diff, v2, current

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeDec 17th 2019
    • (edited Dec 17th 2019)

    I have expanded the statement, by

    first stating it in the form

    H (ΩConf {1,,n}( D))𝒰( n(D)). H_\bullet \big( \Omega \underset{{}^{\{1,\cdots, n\}}}{Conf}(\mathbb{R}^D) \big) \;\simeq\; \mathcal{U} \big( \mathcal{L}_n(D) \big) \,.

    then observing the isomorphism

    (𝒜 n pb,)𝒰( n(D)). \big(\mathcal{A}_n^{pb}, \circ\big) \;\simeq\; \mathcal{U}(\mathcal{L}_n(D)) \,.

    hence the alternative form

    H (ΩConf {1,,n}( D))(𝒜 n pb,) H_\bullet \big( \Omega \underset{{}^{\{1,\cdots, n\}}}{Conf}(\mathbb{R}^D) \big) \;\simeq\; \big(\mathcal{A}_n^{pb}, \circ\big)

    from which then the final result

    H (ΩConf {1,,n}( 3))(𝒲 n pb) Gr (𝒱 pb) H^\bullet \big( \Omega \underset{ {}^{\{1,\cdots,n\}} }{Conf} (\mathbb{R}^3) \big) \;\simeq\; (\mathcal{W}_n^{pb})^\bullet \;\simeq\; Gr^\bullet( \mathcal{V}_{pb} )

    follows.

    The attribution of these stages is dizzying, with Cohen-Gitler and Kohno seemingly citing each other and their own formerly upcoming preprints back and forth, without, it seems, ever dwelling much on spelling out the full proof (?). Luckily there is also Fadell-Husseini 01, Theorem 2.2 for the first stage, and from there the rest is immediate.

    diff, v5, current

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJan 14th 2020

    added a remark to make explicit the Hopf algebra structure on both sides

    diff, v8, current

Add your comments
  • Please log in or leave your comment as a "guest post". If commenting as a "guest", please include your name in the message as a courtesy. Note: only certain categories allow guest posts.
  • To produce a hyperlink to an nLab entry, simply put double square brackets around its name, e.g. [[category]]. To use (La)TeX mathematics in your post, make sure Markdown+Itex is selected below and put your mathematics between dollar signs as usual. Only a subset of the usual TeX math commands are accepted: see here for a list.

  • (Help)