Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).

nLab > Latest Changes: all horizontal weight systems are partitioned Lie algebra weight systems

Bottom of Page

1 to 9 of 9

  1.  
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeDec 2nd 2019

    to record the result of

    v1, current

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeDec 2nd 2019
    • (edited Dec 2nd 2019)

    But I find this confusing, maybe somebody can help me:

    By Bar-Natan 96 all weight systems on horizontal chord diagrams are Lie.

    By Vogel 11 not all weight systems on round chord diagrams are Lie (nor even super-Lie).

    But by Kohno 02 (leading up to Theorem 4.2) the round weight systems are a subspace of the horizontal weight system.

    !?

    There must be some subtle fine print here, and now am worried that I am missing it.

    I guess the point is that Kohno 02 really talks about framed round weight systems (not imposing the 1T relation), while Vogel 11 speaks about unframed weight systems (imposing the 1T relation).

    (?)

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeDec 3rd 2019

    Oh, maybe I see: The weight systems in Bar-Natan 96 are not strictly Lie weight systems: The right map in Fact 7 is, but not its composition with Delta, giving the left map.

    So the theorem here really says something like “weighted” or “partitioned” Lie weight systems span all horizontal weight systems.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeDec 3rd 2019

    edited the entry to bring out this point about the weight systems here really being Lie algebra weight systems composed with a “partitioning” operation. Renamed the entry accordingly.

    diff, v2, current

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeDec 3rd 2019

    Hm, I suppose I need to include the choice of permutation in the “partitioning” data. I was thinking this is redundant, but now I see that it’s not. But need to go offline now.

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeDec 3rd 2019

    have edited accordingly. The final statement now reads as follows:

    Span((||𝔰𝔩(N)Mod /∼⏟Liemodules)×(||⊕ℕℕ⏟tuplesofnumbers)×ℕ(⊔n∈ℕSym(n)⏟permutations)) ⟶epimorphismtr (−)∘w (−)∘Δ (−)(−) 𝒲 pbhorizontalweightsystemsa (C,k=(k 1,⋯,k n),σ) ↦ (Dhorizontalchorddiagrama↦ =tr σ⏞σ-trace∘W C ⊗k 1,⋯,C ⊗k n(D)⏟RTinvariant =tr σ∘w C⏟End-valuedLiealgebraweightsystem∘Δ k⏞partitioning(D)). \array{ Span \Big( \big( \underset{ \mathclap{ \color{blue} {Lie\,modules} } }{ \underbrace{ \mathclap{\phantom{\vert \atop \vert}} \mathfrak{sl}(N) Mod_{/\sim} } } \big) \; \times \; \big( \underset{ \mathclap{ \color{blue} tuples\;of\;numbers } }{ \underbrace{ \mathclap{ \phantom{\vert \atop \vert } } \underset{\mathbb{N}}{\oplus} \mathbb{N} } } \big) \; \underset{\mathbb{N}}{\times} \; \big( \underset{ \color{blue} permutations }{ \underbrace{ \underset{n \in \mathbb{N}}{\sqcup} Sym(n) } } \big) \Big) & \underoverset{\color{blue}epimorphism}{ \;\;\; tr_{(-)} \circ w_{(-)} \circ \Delta^{(-)} (-) \;\;\; }{\longrightarrow} & \overset{ \mathclap{ {\color{blue} horizontal\;weight\;systems} \atop {\phantom{a}} } }{ \mathcal{W}_{pb} } \\ ( C, \;\; k = (k_1, \cdots, k_n), \;\; \sigma ) &\mapsto& \left( \;\;\;\;\; \array{ \overset{ \mathclap{ \color{blue} { {horizontal} \atop { {chord} \atop {diagram} } } \atop {\phantom{a}} } }{ D } \mapsto & \phantom{=\;} \overset{ \mathclap{ \color{blue} \sigma\text{-}trace } }{ \overbrace{ tr_\sigma } } \circ \underset{ \mathclap{ {\color{blue}RT\;invariant} } }{ \underbrace{ W_{{}_{C^{\otimes k_1}, \cdots , C^{\otimes k_n} }}(D) } } \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\; \\ & = tr_\sigma \circ \underset{ \mathclap{ {\color{blue} End\text{-}valued\;Lie\;algebra\;weight\;system} } }{ \underbrace{ w_C } } \circ \overset{ \mathclap{ {\color{blue} partitioning} } }{ \overbrace{ \Delta^k } } (D) } \right) } \,.

    diff, v3, current

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeDec 3rd 2019
    • (edited Dec 3rd 2019)

    added illustrating example of the Δ\Delta-operation (here)

    diff, v4, current

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeDec 3rd 2019

    added also a more generic example

    diff, v5, current

    • CommentRowNumber9.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeDec 4th 2019
    • (edited Dec 4th 2019)

    added illustration of the final result (here)

    diff, v7, current

1 to 9 of 9

  1.