Not signed in (Sign In)

Start a new discussion

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-categories 2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry bundles calculus categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-theory cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive constructive-mathematics cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry differential-topology digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration finite foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry goodwillie-calculus graph graphs gravity grothendieck group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory infinity integration integration-theory k-theory lie lie-theory limit limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic manifolds mathematics measure-theory modal-logic model model-category-theory monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology multicategories nonassociative noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory string-theory subobject superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTime3 days ago

    to record the result of

    v1, current

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTime3 days ago
    • (edited 3 days ago)

    But I find this confusing, maybe somebody can help me:

    By Bar-Natan 96 all weight systems on horizontal chord diagrams are Lie.

    By Vogel 11 not all weight systems on round chord diagrams are Lie (nor even super-Lie).

    But by Kohno 02 (leading up to Theorem 4.2) the round weight systems are a subspace of the horizontal weight system.

    !?

    There must be some subtle fine print here, and now am worried that I am missing it.

    I guess the point is that Kohno 02 really talks about framed round weight systems (not imposing the 1T relation), while Vogel 11 speaks about unframed weight systems (imposing the 1T relation).

    (?)

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTime2 days ago

    Oh, maybe I see: The weight systems in Bar-Natan 96 are not strictly Lie weight systems: The right map in Fact 7 is, but not its composition with Delta, giving the left map.

    So the theorem here really says something like “weighted” or “partitioned” Lie weight systems span all horizontal weight systems.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTime2 days ago

    edited the entry to bring out this point about the weight systems here really being Lie algebra weight systems composed with a “partitioning” operation. Renamed the entry accordingly.

    diff, v2, current

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTime2 days ago

    Hm, I suppose I need to include the choice of permutation in the “partitioning” data. I was thinking this is redundant, but now I see that it’s not. But need to go offline now.

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTime2 days ago

    have edited accordingly. The final statement now reads as follows:

    Span((||𝔰𝔩(N)Mod /Liemodules)×(||tuplesofnumbers)×(nSym(n)permutations)) epimorphismtr ()w ()Δ ()() 𝒲 pbhorizontalweightsystemsa (C,k=(k 1,,k n),σ) (Dhorizontalchorddiagrama =tr σσ-traceW C k 1,,C k n(D)RTinvariant =tr σw CEnd-valuedLiealgebraweightsystemΔ kpartitioning(D)). \array{ Span \Big( \big( \underset{ \mathclap{ \color{blue} {Lie\,modules} } }{ \underbrace{ \mathclap{\phantom{\vert \atop \vert}} \mathfrak{sl}(N) Mod_{/\sim} } } \big) \; \times \; \big( \underset{ \mathclap{ \color{blue} tuples\;of\;numbers } }{ \underbrace{ \mathclap{ \phantom{\vert \atop \vert } } \underset{\mathbb{N}}{\oplus} \mathbb{N} } } \big) \; \underset{\mathbb{N}}{\times} \; \big( \underset{ \color{blue} permutations }{ \underbrace{ \underset{n \in \mathbb{N}}{\sqcup} Sym(n) } } \big) \Big) & \underoverset{\color{blue}epimorphism}{ \;\;\; tr_{(-)} \circ w_{(-)} \circ \Delta^{(-)} (-) \;\;\; }{\longrightarrow} & \overset{ \mathclap{ {\color{blue} horizontal\;weight\;systems} \atop {\phantom{a}} } }{ \mathcal{W}_{pb} } \\ ( C, \;\; k = (k_1, \cdots, k_n), \;\; \sigma ) &\mapsto& \left( \;\;\;\;\; \array{ \overset{ \mathclap{ \color{blue} { {horizontal} \atop { {chord} \atop {diagram} } } \atop {\phantom{a}} } }{ D } \mapsto & \phantom{=\;} \overset{ \mathclap{ \color{blue} \sigma\text{-}trace } }{ \overbrace{ tr_\sigma } } \circ \underset{ \mathclap{ {\color{blue}RT\;invariant} } }{ \underbrace{ W_{{}_{C^{\otimes k_1}, \cdots , C^{\otimes k_n} }}(D) } } \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\; \\ & = tr_\sigma \circ \underset{ \mathclap{ {\color{blue} End\text{-}valued\;Lie\;algebra\;weight\;system} } }{ \underbrace{ w_C } } \circ \overset{ \mathclap{ {\color{blue} partitioning} } }{ \overbrace{ \Delta^k } } (D) } \right) } \,.

    diff, v3, current

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTime2 days ago
    • (edited 2 days ago)

    added illustrating example of the Δ\Delta-operation (here)

    diff, v4, current

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTime2 days ago

    added also a more generic example

    diff, v5, current

    • CommentRowNumber9.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTime1 day ago
    • (edited 1 day ago)

    added illustration of the final result (here)

    diff, v7, current

Add your comments
  • Please log in or leave your comment as a "guest post". If commenting as a "guest", please include your name in the message as a courtesy. Note: only certain categories allow guest posts.
  • To produce a hyperlink to an nLab entry, simply put double square brackets around its name, e.g. [[category]]. To use (La)TeX mathematics in your post, make sure Markdown+Itex is selected below and put your mathematics between dollar signs as usual. Only a subset of the usual TeX math commands are accepted: see here for a list.

  • (Help)