Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Discussion Tag Cloud

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJan 16th 2020
    • (edited Jan 16th 2020)

    In order to formalize some physics, I am looking for a suitable mathematical concept. It looks like the putative concept ought to be something like β€œpro-finite 𝔰𝔲(2)-representations”, but I am not sure yet. And once I am sure, I’ll be wondering if there is any decent established theory for such things.

    The following is the motivation (taken from here):

    Motivation

    There is the remarkable observation (MSJVR 02, checked in AIST 17) that in the BMN matrix model supersymmetric M2-M5-brane bound states are identified with β€œlimit sequences” of isomorphism classes of finite-dimensional complex Lie algebra representations of su(2).

    Concretely, if

    N({N(M2)i,N(M5)i}i)β‰”βŠ•iN(M2)i⋅ρN(M5)iβˆˆπ”°π”²(2)Repfin

    denotes the representation containing

    • N(M2)i direct summands

    of the

    • N(M5)i-dimensional irrep

    (for {N(M2)i,N(M5)i}i∈(β„•Γ—β„•)I some finitely indexed set of pairs of natural numbers)

    with total dimension

    N≔dim(N({N(M2)i,N(M5)i}i))

    then:

    1. an M5-brane configuration corresponds to a sequence of such representations for which

      N(M2)iβ†’βˆž

      for fixed N(M5)i

      and fixed ratios N(M2)i/N

    2. an M2-brane configuration corresponds to a sequence of such representations for which

      N(M5)iβ†’βˆž

      for fixed N(M2)i

      and fixed ratios N(M5)i/N

    for all i∈I.

    Hence, by extension, any other sequence of finite-dimensional 𝔰𝔲(2)-representations is a kind of mixture of these two cases, interpreted as an M2-M5 brane bound state of sorts.

    Question. I’d like to extract a precise definition of β€œM2-M5 brane bound state” from the above. It must subsume suitable limits of finite-dimensional 𝔰𝔲(2)-representation as above. But taken where? And identified how?

    Is β€œprofinite 𝔰𝔲(2)-reps” a thing in representation theory? (i.e. pro-objects in the category of finite-dimensional representations.) Or maybe ind-objects instead? Or something else?

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJan 16th 2020

    Ah, never mind, I see the answer now. It was right in front of me all along.

    The space of interest here is not 𝔰𝔲(2)Rep but the image of Span(𝔰𝔲(2)Rep) in weight systems. Now taking the linear span is what makes sense of expressions like 1N⋅ρN. And their limit with Nβ†’βˆž gotta be taken in the space of weight systems, because that’s precisely what the multi-trace observables of the BMN model observe.

    Okay, case closed. Thanks for listening.

Β