Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration finite foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf sheaves simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
   • CommentTimeFeb 10th 2020
   • PermaLink
   Author: TobyBartels
   Format: MarkdownItexPut some content here, as a disambiguation page. <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/diff/infinity/3">diff</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/infinity/3">v3</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/infinity">current</a>

   Put some content here, as a disambiguation page.

   diff, v3, current

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorRichard Williamson
   • CommentTimeFeb 11th 2020
   • PermaLink
   Author: Richard Williamson
   Format: MarkdownItexIt doesn't really matter, but I'm not convinced by the "common theme" sentence... . Surely the point is more like that it describes something which cannot be counted?

   It doesn’t really matter, but I’m not convinced by the “common theme” sentence… . Surely the point is more like that it describes something which cannot be counted?

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
   • CommentTimeFeb 11th 2020
   • (edited Feb 11th 2020)
   • PermaLink
   Author: TobyBartels
   Format: MarkdownItexMostly it means something larger than every natural number, although not always. I put a sentence saying that and noting a couple of exceptions (one each way). You could still argue (even with those exceptions) that it means something larger than whatever can be counted, for some sense of counting.

   Mostly it means something larger than every natural number, although not always. I put a sentence saying that and noting a couple of exceptions (one each way). You could still argue (even with those exceptions) that it means something larger than whatever can be counted, for some sense of counting.

4. • CommentRowNumber4.
   • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
   • CommentTimeFeb 11th 2020
   • PermaLink
   Author: Todd_Trimble
   Format: MarkdownItex"Larger than" or "beyond". I don't think of ordinary real numbers as things one counts, but when thinking about calculus, I do think of $\infty$ and $-\infty$ as ideal points beyond all finite real numbers. Similarly with valuation fields, etc.

   “Larger than” or “beyond”. I don’t think of ordinary real numbers as things one counts, but when thinking about calculus, I do think of $\infty$ and $-\infty$ as ideal points beyond all finite real numbers. Similarly with valuation fields, etc.