Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limit limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory subobject superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorTim_van_Beek
    • CommentTimeApr 18th 2010

    I made a first draft of a page about unbounded operators, the battle plan contains some basic definitions, explanation of some subtleties of domain issues and what it means to be affiliated to a von Neumann algebra. Right now, only the rigged Hilbert space page refers to it.

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorzskoda
    • CommentTimeApr 18th 2010
    • (edited Apr 18th 2010)

    Great to have that topic opened. It is good to have however the central definition clear, here it is a bit lost among many descriptions which are correct of course. My advice. If you already wrote so much you could have written the very definition (something like: an unbounded operator on a Hilbert space H is a linear operator defined on a dense subspace of H; bounded operators are an example). The entry makes an impression that this is a SUBclass of a notion of a linear operator on H, and in fact it is an EXTENSION of that notion by allowing dense subspaces of definition.

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorTim_van_Beek
    • CommentTimeApr 19th 2010

    It is good to have however the central definition clear…

    I did not notice that the whole “definition” paragraph was missing, it’s there now.

    If you already wrote so much…

    It’s only a fraction of what I would like to write, but the subject is clearly too vast for one page…my motivation is twofold:

    1. Demonstrate with a few examples that a purly formal manipulation of unbounded operators can go completly wrong like in Nelson’s counterexample: If A and B can be restricted to a common domain of essential selfadjointness and commute on that, then the elements of the generated semigroups need not commute. Completly violates the “intuition” build from quantum mechanics.

    2. Explain the spectral theorem via affiliation with the abelian von Neumann algebra that is generated by the spectral projections.

    That will already take a few hours to do.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorzskoda
    • CommentTimeApr 19th 2010

    Great! Go on, I would help, have I not being in such a time/troubled situation with lots of deadlines, demands and all of that within a rare opportunity to do some new work done in the environment of IHES which I am unfortunately leaving in only 10 days (provided the Island's volcano-mediated air-traffic disturbance permits).