Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below
Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
I am moving here an old discussion:
David Speyer asks: Voisin, in Hodge Theory and Complex Algebraic Geometry I, definition 4.35 makes a different definition of fine sheaf. I can see that they are related, but I can’t see precisely what the relation is.
According to Voisin:
:A fine sheaf over is a sheaf of -modules, where is a sheaf of rings such that, for every open cover of , there is a partition of unity (where the sum is locally finite) subordinate to this covering.
A technical point: I infer from context that, for Voisin, being subordinate to means that, for each , there is an open set such that and . This is slightly stronger than requiring that . When working on a regular (T3) space, I believe that, if partitions of unity exist in the weaker sense, than they also exist in the stronger sense.
Zoran: paracompact Hausdorff space is automatically normal (Dieudonne’s theorem) so a fortiori . A partition of unity subordinate to the covering means as usual that for each there is such that . Thanks for the other correction.
couple properties related to sheaf cohomology.
1 to 5 of 5