Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeOct 2nd 2009
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: Markdowncreated [[Kock-Lawvere axiom]]

   created Kock-Lawvere axiom

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeOct 4th 2009
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: Markdownreacted and replies to [[Zoran Skoda|Zoran]] at [[Kock-Lawvere axiom]]. Can anyone help with the terminology issue on "Weil algebra" as "algebra of the form R + m with m a nilpotent ideal"? This seems to be standard terminology in the SDG literature.

   reacted and replies to Zoran at Kock-Lawvere axiom.

   Can anyone help with the terminology issue on "Weil algebra" as "algebra of the form R + m with m a nilpotent ideal"? This seems to be standard terminology in the SDG literature.

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeNov 4th 2017
   • (edited Nov 4th 2017)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItex(...years later...) Finally added pointer ([here](https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Kock-Lawvere+axiom#Kock77)) to what seems to be the original article: * [[Anders Kock]], _A simple axiomatics for differentiation_, Mathematica Scandinavica Vol. 40, No. 2 (October 24, 1977), pp. 183-193 ([JSTOR](http://www.jstor.org/stable/24491223)) Added this also to _[[derivative]]_, _[[partial derivative]]_ and _[[differentiation]]_.

   (…years later…)

   Finally added pointer (here) to what seems to be the original article:

   • Anders Kock, A simple axiomatics for differentiation, Mathematica Scandinavica Vol. 40, No. 2 (October 24, 1977), pp. 183-193 (JSTOR)

   Added this also to derivative, partial derivative and differentiation.

4. • CommentRowNumber4.
   • CommentAuthormaxsnew
   • CommentTimeApr 4th 2023
   • PermaLink
   Author: maxsnew
   Format: MarkdownItexClarify that the statement of Kock-Lawvere can be formulated equivalently either in terms of isomorphisms of objects or internal algebras. <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/diff/Kock-Lawvere+axiom/13">diff</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/Kock-Lawvere+axiom/13">v13</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Kock-Lawvere+axiom">current</a>

   Clarify that the statement of Kock-Lawvere can be formulated equivalently either in terms of isomorphisms of objects or internal algebras.

   diff, v13, current