Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorDmitri Pavlov
    • CommentTimeApr 27th 2020

    Added a related concept.

    diff, v8, current

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorDmitri Pavlov
    • CommentTimeApr 27th 2020

    This article claims:

    Another equivalent definition is: an integral domain is any subring of a skewfield. Specifically, any integral domain R is a subring of its field of fractions.

    However, field of fractions claims

    Not every noncommutative integral domain can be embedded at all into a division ring.

    It looks like there is a contradiction between these two claims.

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorDmitri Pavlov
    • CommentTimeMay 2nd 2020

    The claim in this article was added in Revision 7 by Toby Bartels on September 15, 2016.

    The claim in field of fractions was added in Revision 1 by Zoran Škoda on July 27, 2011.

    I think Zoran is correct here, though it would be nice to have a specific counterexample.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
    • CommentTimeMay 2nd 2020

    In the language that I speak, an integral domain is a non-terminal commutative ring with no zero divisors, and my own opinion is that this should be the default. I accept that some mathematicians refer to noncommutative integral domains, but I think they are in the minority.

    According to the Encyclopedia of Mathematics, a counterexample to Toby’s claim can be found in P.M. Cohn’s book “Free rings and their relations”.

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorDmitri Pavlov
    • CommentTimeMay 2nd 2020

    Deleted the incorrect statement.

    diff, v9, current

  1. added link to Wikipedia article

    Anonymous

    diff, v24, current

  2. added fact that every integral domain is a reduced ring.

    Anonymous

    diff, v25, current

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeOct 24th 2023

    Deleted the claim that “on the nLab” we demand integral domains and commutative, and instead added a remark below the definition on differing conventions.

    diff, v27, current

  3. changed higher algebra - contents to algebra - contents in context sidebar

    Anonymouse

    diff, v30, current