Not signed in (Sign In)

Start a new discussion

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry differential-topology digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration finite foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry goodwillie-calculus graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homology homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology newpage nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory object of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorzskoda
    • CommentTimeApr 22nd 2010

    Significant improvements and expansion in determinant line bundle and new related stub analytic torsion.

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorzskoda
    • CommentTimeApr 22nd 2010

    Another radical expansion of determinant line bundle.

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeSep 3rd 2014

    added the actual definition at analytic torsion

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeSep 3rd 2014

    In arithmetic topology it is claimed by Morishita that

    the Iwasawa main conjecture, which relates Iwasawa polynomials with p-adic analytic zeta functions, may be seen as an analogue of the relation between Reidemeister torsions and analytic torsions. (p. 28)

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeSep 3rd 2014

    Thanks. I made a brief note on that at analytic torsion, need to look into it later.

    By the way, there is a vague similarity between Reznikov’s variant of arithmetic topology and the 2-framings via cobounding 4-manifolds which appear in the definition of Chern-Simons theory.

    Given the general thrust of the analogy, this might be relevant, but I’d need to think more about it.

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeSep 3rd 2014

    You often see analytic torsion and eta invariant mentioned together. E.g., John Lott says

    They have the flavor of being “secondary” invariants. In recent years much progress has been made in making this precise, in showing how [they] arise via transgression from “primary” invariants.

    Presumably that’s in the same sense of the secondary invariants of sec 3.1 of the Regensberg proposal.

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeSep 3rd 2014

    Lott’s clearer about the relationship here where eta invariant and analytic torsion appear as analogues in Table 1.

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeSep 3rd 2014

    The closest relation that I am aware of is that when treating the Chern-Simons path integral in perturbation theory then it becomes a product of powers/exponentials of analytic torsion and the eta invariant.

    I had had dug out fairly good reviews of this late last night, but I lost the collected links this morning.

    The story is however already told by Witten in his original article (here): in (2.8) the determinant of the Laplace operator appears, then in (2.14) the eta invariant. The latter term is also discussed for instance in Lott 90.

    I had some references that produced the full CS path integral expression including both the analytic torsion and the eta invariant more neatly. Will have to search for them again, though.

Add your comments
  • Please log in or leave your comment as a "guest post". If commenting as a "guest", please include your name in the message as a courtesy. Note: only certain categories allow guest posts.
  • To produce a hyperlink to an nLab entry, simply put double square brackets around its name, e.g. [[category]]. To use (La)TeX mathematics in your post, make sure Markdown+Itex is selected below and put your mathematics between dollar signs as usual. Only a subset of the usual TeX math commands are accepted: see here for a list.

  • (Help)