Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeApr 24th 2010
   • (edited Apr 24th 2010)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexadded a new Examples-section <a href="http://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/fiber+sequence#Integralreal">Integral versus real cohomology</a> to [[fiber sequence]] (and renamed the original [[fibration sequence]] and made it a redirect to that -- but the cache bug is in the way,as usual).

   added a new Examples-section Integral versus real cohomology to fiber sequence

   (and renamed the original fibration sequence and made it a redirect to that – but the cache bug is in the way,as usual).

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeMay 3rd 2010
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexadded a detailed proof of how <a href="http://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/fiber+sequence#OfFuncCats">homotopy fibers of oo-functor categories</a> are computed in terms of over-categories.

   added a detailed proof of how homotopy fibers of oo-functor categories are computed in terms of over-categories.

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeMay 3rd 2010
   • (edited May 3rd 2010)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexif you think about it, the proof I just mentioned is the full-fledged version of the proof that we sketched previously in the section <a href="http://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/twisted+cohomology#InTermsOfSections">In terms of sections</a> at [[twisted cohomology]]. I have added some more sentences to this effect now.

   if you think about it, the proof I just mentioned is the full-fledged version of the proof that we sketched previously in the section In terms of sections at twisted cohomology. I have added some more sentences to this effect now.

4. • CommentRowNumber4.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeMay 4th 2010
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexadded an Examples <a href="http://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/fiber+sequence#CharOfEquivalences">section</a> on how equivalences are characterized by having contractible homotopy fibers

   added an Examples section on how equivalences are characterized by having contractible homotopy fibers

5. • CommentRowNumber5.
   • CommentAuthorTim_Porter
   • CommentTimeNov 25th 2013
   • (edited Nov 25th 2013)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Tim_Porter
   Format: MarkdownItexThe last reference in the [[fiber sequence]] entry has now been published. I have updated the entry. The previous title at this point was wrong by the way. It did not correspond to the paper to which the link refered. I hope this is now correct.

   The last reference in the fiber sequence entry has now been published. I have updated the entry. The previous title at this point was wrong by the way. It did not correspond to the paper to which the link refered. I hope this is now correct.

6. • CommentRowNumber6.
   • CommentAuthorTim_Porter
   • CommentTimeMar 20th 2014
   • PermaLink
   Author: Tim_Porter
   Format: MarkdownItexAn Anonymous has made changes to [[fiber sequence]] in the section on Mayer-Vietoris. I do not understand their point. They did change something to $A\times C$, but from the pullback this should be $A\times B$ and ... in other words the entry seems to be a mess at this point (glancing at it). The diagram is wrong as well. There are several ways to fix it, but I am not sure which is intended.

   An Anonymous has made changes to fiber sequence in the section on Mayer-Vietoris. I do not understand their point. They did change something to $A\times C$, but from the pullback this should be $A\times B$ and … in other words the entry seems to be a mess at this point (glancing at it). The diagram is wrong as well. There are several ways to fix it, but I am not sure which is intended.

7. • CommentRowNumber7.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeMar 20th 2014
   • (edited Mar 20th 2014)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexThanks for the alert. I have fixed it now ([here](http://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/fiber+sequence#MayerVietoris)), both the original diagram as well as the fiber sequence afterwards, exchanging Bs for Cs. I suppose somebody saw the typo, kindly went to fix it, but then didn't exactly.

   Thanks for the alert. I have fixed it now (here), both the original diagram as well as the fiber sequence afterwards, exchanging Bs for Cs.

   I suppose somebody saw the typo, kindly went to fix it, but then didn’t exactly.

8. • CommentRowNumber8.
   • CommentAuthorTim_Porter
   • CommentTimeMar 20th 2014
   • PermaLink
   Author: Tim_Porter
   Format: MarkdownItexThat is what I suspected.

   That is what I suspected.