Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeJul 18th 2020
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexI am finally splitting this off from _[[G-structure]]_. Have added comments on the disambiguation both here and there <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/tangential+structure/1">v1</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/tangential+structure">current</a>

   I am finally splitting this off from G-structure. Have added comments on the disambiguation both here and there

   v1, current

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorLuigi
   • CommentTimeMay 5th 2021
   • (edited May 5th 2021)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Luigi
   Format: MarkdownItexI would have a question about something that is really interesting me. In generalised geometry we have a generalised notion of $G$-structure, which is defined on the generalised tangent bundle $E \simeq T M \oplus T^\ast M$, rather than on the tangent bundle. Since the generalised tangent bundle canonically corresponds to a cocycle $M \rightarrow \mathbf{B}O(d,d)$, these generalised structures are given by a lift of this cocycle via $\mathbf{B}G \hookrightarrow \mathbf{B}O(d,d)$. Examples: $G=U(d/2,d/2)$ and $G=O(d)\times O(d)$. My question is the following: is it possible to generalise the notion of cobordism of $G$-structures to a "generalised cobordism of generalised $G$-structures"? Can it give rise to some form of generalised Thom spectrum (or, maybe, a generalised Madsen-Tillmann spectrum)? Since these structures are related (in some sense) a more general notion of string compactification, this could have some relevance in the cobordism swampland conjecture. Many thanks in advance for any reply!

   I would have a question about something that is really interesting me.

   In generalised geometry we have a generalised notion of $G$-structure, which is defined on the generalised tangent bundle $E \simeq T M \oplus T^\ast M$, rather than on the tangent bundle. Since the generalised tangent bundle canonically corresponds to a cocycle $M \rightarrow \mathbf{B}O(d,d)$, these generalised structures are given by a lift of this cocycle via $\mathbf{B}G \hookrightarrow \mathbf{B}O(d,d)$. Examples: $G=U(d/2,d/2)$ and $G=O(d)\times O(d)$.

   My question is the following: is it possible to generalise the notion of cobordism of $G$-structures to a “generalised cobordism of generalised $G$-structures”? Can it give rise to some form of generalised Thom spectrum (or, maybe, a generalised Madsen-Tillmann spectrum)?

   Since these structures are related (in some sense) a more general notion of string compactification, this could have some relevance in the cobordism swampland conjecture.

   Many thanks in advance for any reply!

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeMay 5th 2021
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexIt can certainly be defined. But I am not sure if I remember anyone proving results about it. As proof of principle, something closely related is well-studied: cobordism with [[2-framing]]: which is reduction of $T X \oplus T X$. I know that Sawin04 ([pdf](https://digitalcommons.fairfield.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1020&context=mathandcomputerscience-facultypubs)) discusses 2-framed cobordism, but there must be more. Googling for "2-framed cobordism" yields hits.

   It can certainly be defined. But I am not sure if I remember anyone proving results about it.

   As proof of principle, something closely related is well-studied: cobordism with 2-framing: which is reduction of $T X \oplus T X$. I know that Sawin04 (pdf) discusses 2-framed cobordism, but there must be more. Googling for “2-framed cobordism” yields hits.