Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).

nLab > Latest Changes: action groupoid

Bottom of Page

1 to 7 of 7

  1.  
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeApr 27th 2010

    added to action groupoid a section on action oo-groupoids

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeApr 27th 2010
    • (edited Apr 27th 2010)

    since it is an important example, I added a section action oo-groupoids also to fiber sequence

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorzskoda
    • CommentTimeApr 28th 2010

    Thanks alot. But what I was having in mind is to have the data of action quasicategory directly in terms of Kan complex which is acting and the quasicategory which is acted upon. Doing abstract infinity limit involving an action into indirectly defined quasicategory of automorphisms is too far from practical use.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeApr 28th 2010
    • (edited Apr 28th 2010)

    Yeah, I know, it can be hard to compute. There are of course explicit tools to compute the Grothendieck construction (some mentioned at (infinity,1)-Grothendieck construction) but it can still be hard, sure.

    But I think for low categorical degree, one can handle it: that universal fibration Z→∞nGrpdZ \to \infty nGrpd should be really just the fiber of the codomain fibration for nGrpdn Grpd over one of its legs, i.e. the pullbacl

    Z → * ↓ ↓ nGrpd Δ[1] → nGrpd ↓ nGrpd. \array{ Z &\to& * \\ \downarrow && \downarrow \\ n Grpd^{\Delta[1]} &\to& n Grpd \\ \downarrow \\ n Grpd } \,.

    And then the ordinary pullback of that should be the action nn-groupoid.

    So in other words I am saying that the action n-groupoid should be computed just as the homotopy pullback of the point

    V//G → * ↓ ↓ BG → ∞Grpd \array{ V//G &\to& * \\ \downarrow && \downarrow \\ \mathbf{B}G &\to & \infty Grpd }

    using the tools described at homotopy pullback, only that instead of using the path object ∞Grpd I\infty Grpd^I we use the arrow category ∞Grpd Δ[1]\infty Grpd^{\Delta[1]}.

    So in other words: the thing should really be the lax (“comma”) pullback of the point, simply. I expect that this is really what Lurie’s universal fibration Z→∞GrpdZ \to \infty Grpd achieves, but I have not found the time to really check this.

  5. added some comment about notation X//GX//G

    diff, v26, current

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorJohn Baez
    • CommentTimeSep 5th 2022

    Deleted “available from Amazon” in description of Ronnie Brown’s book - this seems inappropriate. Restore it if you disagree!

    diff, v29, current

  7. Changed // to \sslash

    Terinuva

    diff, v32, current

1 to 7 of 7

  1.