Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).

nLab > Latest Changes: rational parametrized homotopy theory

Bottom of Page

1 to 8 of 8

  1.  
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeAug 29th 2020

    starting something…

    v1, current

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeAug 29th 2020
    • (edited Aug 30th 2020)

    added this statement:

    Let

    F ⟶fib A ↓ p B \array{ F &\overset{fib}{\longrightarrow}& A \\ && \big\downarrow{}^{\mathrlap{p}} \\ && B }

    be a Serre fibration of connected topological spaces, with fiber FF (over any base point) also connected.

    If in addition

    1. π 1(B)\pi_1(B) acts nilpotently on H •(F,k)H_\bullet(F,k)

      (e.g. if BB is simply connected);

    2. at least one of AA, FF have rational finite type

    then the cofiber of any relative Sullivan model for pp is a Sullivan model for FF.

    diff, v2, current

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
    • CommentTimeAug 29th 2020

    Did you mean π 1(Y)\pi_1(Y) acts nilpotently?

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeAug 30th 2020

    Yes, I had fixed it in the entry, didn’t fix it here.

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeAug 30th 2020
    • (edited Aug 30th 2020)

    added the addendum:

    Moreover, if CE(𝔩B)CE(\mathfrak{l}B) is a minimal Sullivan model for BB, then the cofiber of the corresponding minimal relative Sullivan model for pp is the minimal Sullivan model CE(𝔩F)CE(\mathfrak{l}F) for FF:

    CE(𝔩F) ⟵cofib(CE(𝔩p)) CE(𝔩 BA) ↓ CE(𝔩p) CE(𝔩B) \array{ CE(\mathfrak{l}F) &\overset{ cofib \big( CE(\mathfrak{l}p) \big) }{\longleftarrow}& CE(\mathfrak{l}_{{}_B}A) \\ && \big\downarrow{}^{\mathrlap{ CE(\mathfrak{l}p) }} \\ && CE(\mathfrak{l}B) }

    diff, v3, current

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeAug 31st 2020

    added pointer to:

    diff, v4, current

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeAug 31st 2020

    added the following further addendum to the proposition:

    But this cofiber, being the cofiber of a relative Sullivan model and hence of a cofibration in the projective model structure on dgc-algebras, is in fact the homotopy cofiber, and hence is a model for the homotopy fiber of the rationalized fibration.

    Therefore (eq:SullivanModelForFiber) implies that on fibrations of connected finite-type spaces where π 1\pi_1 of the base acts nilpotently on the homology of the fiber, rationalization preserves homotopy fibers.

    (This was originally proven in Bousfield-Kan 72, Chapter II.)

    diff, v4, current

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeSep 3rd 2020

    added pointer also to the followup book

    where the above statement appears as Theorem 5.1

    diff, v5, current

1 to 8 of 8

  1.