Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf sheaves simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeSep 10th 2020

    added pointer to:

    diff, v9, current

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeSep 10th 2020
    • (edited Sep 10th 2020)

    On p. 5 of the above article it says that all dgc-algebras are assumed to be equal to the ground field in degree 0.

    But is this really what is meant?

    I don’t see it being used. On the contrary: Later on the simplicial sets seem to be meant to be just pointed, not reduced, so that the PL-de Rham functor would not take them to dgc-algebras with that property.

    The discussion on p. suggests that what is actually used is that the dgc-algebras are unital.

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeOct 2nd 2020

    added pointer to

    • Peter J. Kahn, Rational Moore G-Spaces, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society Vol. 298, No. 1 (1986), pp. 245-271 (jstor:2000619)

    diff, v16, current

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeDec 27th 2021

    I am vaguely wondering:

    Might the construction from Scull 2008 of a model category of dg-algebras parameterized over an orbit category generalize to parameterization over any “fundamental category” of a GG-space (in the sense here)?

    I haven’t really thought about it yet, except for noticing that Golasinski 1997a, 1997b amplifies that the existence of injective minimal models in this context depends only on the parameter category being an EI-category – which is still the case for those “fundamental categories”.

    diff, v21, current

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeDec 30th 2021

    I have now forwarded this question (#4) to MathOverflow:q/412833.