Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
   • CommentTimeOct 5th 2009
   • PermaLink
   Author: Mike Shulman
   Format: MarkdownLooks like maybe Todd is right at [[cyclic order]] that the [[cycle category]] cannot be defined in that way.

   Looks like maybe Todd is right at cyclic order that the cycle category cannot be defined in that way.

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
   • CommentTimeOct 5th 2009
   • PermaLink
   Author: TobyBartels
   Format: MarkdownI thought that we'd already agreed on that, but it turns out that the text doesn't reflect that … well, it didn't, but now it does.

   I thought that we'd already agreed on that, but it turns out that the text doesn't reflect that … well, it didn't, but now it does.

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
   • CommentTimeOct 5th 2009
   • PermaLink
   Author: David_Corfield
   Format: HtmlAdded something to your discussion, but you probably understood this already. Fun though that the Leister-Euler characteristic is infinity (the harmonic sum) as befits a category which is a kind of product of $\Delta$ and the groupoid which is the union of finite cyclic groups.

   Added something to your discussion, but you probably understood this already. Fun though that the Leister-Euler characteristic is infinity (the harmonic sum) as befits a category which is a kind of product of $\Delta$ and the groupoid which is the union of finite cyclic groups.