Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor galois-theory gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics planar pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorAndrew Stacey
    • CommentTimeMay 5th 2010

    We have a wikipedia page! It’s at nLab (wikipedia). Since its inception, it’s survived a “speedy delete” challenge.

    (I have absolutely no idea of the rules of wikipedia editing so am definitely not encouraging anyone to go over and write great reams there. Maybe someone with a bit more experience can outline the pitfalls for me.)

    PS Note the wiki-link to wikipedia!

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorMichael Hardy
    • CommentTimeMay 6th 2010
    Here's one of the pitfalls: Wikipedia articles are supposed to have a "neutral point of view" (NPOV). That means you shouldn't write "Our magnificent site is called nLab." The word "Our" is inappropriate since people having nothing to do with nLab can contribute to the article and they can't call it "our site". "Magnificent" is not consistent with the sort of journalistic neutrality that is the goal. An article should assert that its topic is somehow "notable" in a way that justifies its inclusion (that's what the speedy-deletion proposal was questioning; see There are style conventions (see Don't try to read the whole manual. Just try to format an article like others you see there that have been worked on by a number of people; if you're a newbie you'll usually get pointers from others. There's also this: DO NOT EVER begin an article by saying "Let H be a separable Hilbert space...." etc. First you need to tell the lay reader that mathematics is what it's about; you can't assume the lay reader has heard of a Hilbert space. You can start with "In mathematics, Xmith's theorem states that all bounded linear operators on a separable Hilbert space are purple", but you shouldn't say "In functional analysis, Xmith's theorem states...." etc., since that fails to tell the lay reader that it's not about psychology. The lay reader has heard of geometry, algebra, calculus, etc., but not of category theory, functional analysis, etc. I think "number theory" does the job even if the lay reader hasn't heard of that, since it's self-explanatory.