# Start a new discussion

## Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

## Site Tag Cloud

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

• CommentRowNumber1.
• CommentAuthorUrs
• CommentTimeDec 19th 2020

Under “Selected writings” I have added pointer to

• Jürg Fröhlich, Non-perturbative quantum field theory – Mathematical Aspects and Applications, Advanced Series in Mathematical Physics, World Scientific 1992 (doi:10.1142/1245)

and then I added quote of the following passage, from p. 11, on laying foundations for perturbative string theory via rigorous formulation of 2d SCFT in terms of conformal nets or similar:

I still have hopes, perhaps romantic ones, that string theory, or something inspired by it, will come back to life again. I believe it is interesting to attempt to formulate string theory in an “invariant” way, quite like it is useful to formulate geometry in a coordinate-independent way. One might, for example, start with a family $\mathcal{F}$, of hyperfinite type $III_1$ von Neumann algebras – to be a little technical – indexed by intervals of the circle with non-emptry complement (or of the super-circle). It may pay to formulate the starting point using the language of sheaves. $[...]$ This structure determines a braided monoidal C*-category with unit, …; briefly, a quantum theory. From a combination of such tensor categories (left and right movers) one would attempt to reconstruct (symmetries of) physical space-time. String amplitudes would correspond to arrows (intertwiners) of the tensor category. $[...]$ it would provide a general way of thinking about string theory that does not presuppose knowing the target space-time of the theory.