Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
  1. The conjecture is not true for all single-sorted algebraic theories and this was known by Soviet mathematicians. I added a short high-level explanation on this and some references to translated works that have more detail. Presumably one should edit rest of the page (and references to it) to make it clear throughout that (i) the conjecture is false (ii) the general question “Which algebraic categories have the Higman property?” is still interesting (and potentially something category-theorists could study).

    diff, v6, current

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorRichard Williamson
    • CommentTimeDec 22nd 2020
    • (edited Dec 22nd 2020)

    Thank you for this, great to bring this work to people’s attention. Yes, I agree, the Idea section should be tweaked in the way you mention. I don’t know anything about this, so will refrain from making the edits myself; perhaps you would like to do so?

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeDec 23rd 2020
    • (edited Dec 23rd 2020)

    I have just added the respective lines from #1 to the Idea section:

    While in fact the conjecture is not true for all single-sorted algebraic theories (see below), as was known by Soviet mathematicians, the general question “Which algebraic categories have the Higman property?” is still interesting (and potentially something category-theorists could study).

    diff, v8, current

  2. I added more or less the same sentence to the two other pages pointing to this page - namely Lawvere theory and Higman's embedding theorem.