Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below
Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
Thanks. I’ll be interested in having a look when it’s further developed.
For the moment I have just de-capitalized “lattice QCD” in order to make the intended link to lattice QCD come out.
Conversely, I suppose “Symanzik” ought to be capitalized, no?
I have added a reference with review:
as well as references for the original articles:
Kurt Symanzik, Section 3 of: Some topics in quantum field theory In: Schrader R., Seiler R., Uhlenbrock D.A. (eds.) Mathematical Problems in Theoretical Physics Lecture Notes in Physics, vol 153, Springer 1982 (doi:10.1007/3-540-11192-1_11)
Kurt Symanzik, Continuum limit and improved action in lattice theories: (I). Principles and $\phi^4$ theory, Nuclear Physics B Volume 226, Issue 1, 26 September 1983, Pages 187-204 Nuclear Physics B (doi:10.1016/0550-3213(83)90468-6)
Then I added the following lead-in sentence to the top of the Idea-section, for orientation:
In the field of quantum chromodynamics, what is known as Symanzik’s effective field theory (Symanzik 82, Symanzik 83) is a type of effective field theory used in lattice QCD in order to deal with lattice-spacing effects.
Also, I went ahead and capitalized “Symanzik” in the title.
Thanks, sounds good!
The title convention is (see here):
Page titles should be uncapitalized, except for words that are always capitalized.
So e.g. Einstein’s equations since “einstein’s equations” looks weird.
1 to 5 of 5