Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeJan 26th 2021
   • (edited Jan 26th 2021)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexThe first line of the Idea-section read: > Every [[magma]] $A$ has an _opposite_ $A^op$ in which the operation goes the other direction. This rather sounded like talking about co-magmas. I have replaced this now with the following more lengthy but less ambiguous sentence: > The _opposite_ of a magma -- hence of a set with a binary operation $(x,y) \mapsto x y$ -- has the same underlying set of elements, but binary operation changed by _reversing the order_ of the factors: $(x,y) \mapsto y x$. Also I touched the Definition-section, trying to beautify a little, both the wording and the formulas. <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/diff/opposite+magma/4">diff</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/opposite+magma/4">v4</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/opposite+magma">current</a>

   The first line of the Idea-section read:

   Every magma $A$ has an opposite $A^op$ in which the operation goes the other direction.

   This rather sounded like talking about co-magmas. I have replaced this now with the following more lengthy but less ambiguous sentence:

   The opposite of a magma – hence of a set with a binary operation $(x,y) \mapsto x y$ – has the same underlying set of elements, but binary operation changed by reversing the order of the factors: $(x,y) \mapsto y x$.

   Also I touched the Definition-section, trying to beautify a little, both the wording and the formulas.

   diff, v4, current