Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
   • CommentTimeJan 26th 2021
   • PermaLink
   Author: Mike Shulman
   Format: MarkdownItexAdded a link to slides from a talk about HoTT-style stack semantics: * [[Mike Shulman]], _Large categories and quantifiers in topos theory_, [slides](http://home.sandiego.edu/~shulman/papers/cambridge-stacksem.pdf) (2021) <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/diff/stack+semantics/10">diff</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/stack+semantics/10">v10</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/stack+semantics">current</a>

   Added a link to slides from a talk about HoTT-style stack semantics:

   • Mike Shulman, Large categories and quantifiers in topos theory, slides (2021)

   diff, v10, current

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
   • CommentTimeJan 27th 2021
   • PermaLink
   Author: DavidRoberts
   Format: MarkdownItexMay I be bold and ask if you have an ETA for the updated/new version of the stack semantics paper? Understandably you have lots of other exciting projects...

   May I be bold and ask if you have an ETA for the updated/new version of the stack semantics paper? Understandably you have lots of other exciting projects…

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
   • CommentTimeJan 27th 2021
   • PermaLink
   Author: Mike Shulman
   Format: MarkdownItexThe short answer is no. (-: It's definitely higher up on the to do list than it used to be, in that now I think I finally actually understand how it relates to HoTT (as I tried to explain in this talk). But I don't know when I'll get to it. The last time I tried, I somehow got distracted into playing around with constructive Quillen model structures...

   The short answer is no. (-:

   It’s definitely higher up on the to do list than it used to be, in that now I think I finally actually understand how it relates to HoTT (as I tried to explain in this talk). But I don’t know when I’ll get to it. The last time I tried, I somehow got distracted into playing around with constructive Quillen model structures…

4. • CommentRowNumber4.
   • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
   • CommentTimeJan 27th 2021
   • PermaLink
   Author: DavidRoberts
   Format: MarkdownItexFair enough! It certainly looks a lot cleaner and even more conceptual presented the way you did, in any case.

   Fair enough! It certainly looks a lot cleaner and even more conceptual presented the way you did, in any case.

5. • CommentRowNumber5.
   • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
   • CommentTimeJan 28th 2021
   • PermaLink
   Author: Mike Shulman
   Format: MarkdownItexThanks! I think so too. The fact that I "knew" some more conceptual explanation like this "had" to exist is one reason why it took me so long to rework the original stack semantics paper in the first place.

   Thanks! I think so too. The fact that I “knew” some more conceptual explanation like this “had” to exist is one reason why it took me so long to rework the original stack semantics paper in the first place.