Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration finite foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).

nLab > Latest Changes: circle type

Bottom of Page

1 to 19 of 19

  1.  

  1. Page created, but author did not leave any comments.

    Anonymous

    v1, current

  2. added info about the circle type

    Anonymous

    diff, v5, current

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJun 8th 2022

    fixed some grammar and touched the wording in the Definition-section

    diff, v6, current

  4. Adding link to Jordan curve

    Anonymous

    diff, v8, current

  5. Adding coequalizer definition of the circle type

    Anonymous

    diff, v9, current

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJan 30th 2023

    tried to bring some logical order back into the list of references.

    diff, v11, current

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorGuest
    • CommentTimeMar 1st 2023

    This page says:

    Its induction principle says that for any P:S1→Type equipped with a point base′:P(base) and a dependent path loop′:base′=base′, there is f:∏(x:S1)P(x) such that:

    Should it instead say loop′:trloopP(base′)=base′, or loop′:base′=loopPbase′, or “dependent path loop′:base′=base′ over loop”, or something like that? Does it matter?

    Adrian

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 2nd 2023
    • (edited Mar 2nd 2023)

    I think that’s right, there is a transport involved. That’s what the link dependent path is referring to. For the moment i have added (here) the missing =loop-subscript and a pointer to UFP13, p. 177.

    Ideally I would like to polish up the whole presentation (which is due to the notorious “Anonymous”, in revision 5) but not now.

    diff, v12, current

    • CommentRowNumber9.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 2nd 2023

    On whether it matters: I expected it does. While I haven’t tried to write out a formal argument, a quick idea goes as follows:

    In the higher induction principle of the suspension type SS0 there is certainly such dependent identifications involved, namely along the two “meridian” paths from the “north pole” to the “south pole”: by the general rules of higher inductive types, but also because here it would not even type-check otherwise. But then for the evident map S1→SS0 to be an equivalence, there must be a corresponding dependent identification also in the induction principle of S1.

  10. Assuming that the computation rule for the basepoint of S1 is propositional, the propositional computation rule for the loop of S1 listed on the page in the section titled “In natural deduction” is wrong. The application of the dependent function indS1(c*,c𝓁) defined in the elimination rule of S1 to the loop identification 𝓁:*=S1* is actually in the heterogeneous identity type

    indS1(c*,c𝓁)(*)=𝓁̲.CindS1(c*,c𝓁)(*)

    rather than the heterogeneous identity type c*=𝓁̲.Cc*. One needs to transport the application across the identification β*S1(c*,c𝓁):indS1(c*,c𝓁)(*)=C(*)c* found in the propositional computation rule for the basepoint *:S1 in order for everything to type check in the propositional computation rule for the loop, or otherwise use a heterogeneous identity type instead of a homogeneous identity type, like

    β𝓁S1(c*,c𝓁):apdindS1(c*,c𝓁)(𝓁)=β*S1(c*,c𝓁)̲.(−)=𝓁̲.C(−)c𝓁

  11. fixed computation rules, and also switched notation for the identity types over to the usual a=Ab for consistency with the rest of the article and with references i.e. the HoTT book

    diff, v22, current

  12. Similarly with using base and loop for the path and point constructors of the circle type throughout the article, for consistency with the rest of the article and with the references.

    diff, v22, current

  13. Also switched all mentions of “identification type” over to “identity type” for consistency.

    diff, v23, current

    • CommentRowNumber14.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeDec 5th 2023

    The term “identification type” is the more logically consistent one, though.

  15. The term “identification type” is the more logically consistent one, though.

    If you prefer, I could use “identification type” throughout the article instead of “identity type”. The problem is that originally the article used both “identification type” and “identity type”.

  16. I added an explanation for the inference rules for the circle type, similar to the explanation for the inference rules for identity types over in that article.

    diff, v24, current

  17. By suggestion of Urs on the nForum, I have switched identity type to identification type.

    diff, v24, current

  18. I have merged the section on the induction and recursion principle under the properties section into the definitions section - where the induction and recursion principles are defined via the elimination and computation rules.

    diff, v26, current

  19. starting section on the large recursion principle of the circle type

    Anonymouse

    diff, v38, current

1 to 19 of 19

  1.