Not signed in (Sign In)

Start a new discussion

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration finite foundations functional-analysis functor galois-theory gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie lie-theory limit limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic manifolds mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeApr 4th 2021
    • (edited Apr 4th 2021)

    am giving this its own entry, in order to record sufficient conditions on topological subgroup inclusions HGH \subset G for the coset space coprodoction GG/HG \to G/H to admit local sections.

    So far I have two original references here (Gleason 50, Mostert 53). One should add some textbook account, too.

    Am also referencing this at closed subgroup, at coset space and maybe elsewhere.

    v1, current

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeApr 4th 2021
    • (edited Apr 4th 2021)

    at coset space it is claimed (I guess this was myself) that the proof for compact Lie subgroups is due to

    But scanning through this article now, I haven’t spotted yet where that statement would appear in this article.

    v1, current

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeApr 4th 2021

    changed page name from “… with local sections” to “… admitting local sections”

    v1, current

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeApr 4th 2021

    changed page name to singular

    diff, v2, current

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeApr 12th 2021

    I have added pointer to Section 3 of

    • Takashi Karube, On the local cross-sections in locally compact groups, J. Math. Soc. Japan 10(4): 343-347 (October, 1958) (doi:10.2969/jmsj/01040343)

    for mentioning of one and a half counter-examples.

    Any larger collection of counter-examples out there?

    diff, v4, current

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeSep 6th 2021
    • (edited Sep 6th 2021)

    added pointer also to:

    Tammo tom Dieck, Theodor Bröcker, Thm. 4.3 on p. 33 of: *Representations of compact Lie groups, Springer 1985 (doi:10.1007/978-3-662-12918-0)

    diff, v5, current

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeSep 6th 2021
    • (edited Sep 6th 2021)

    also included this into the statement of the proposition (here)

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTime7 days ago
    • (edited 7 days ago)

    added (here) the example U()U()/S 1PU()\mathrm{U}(\mathcal{H}) \to \mathrm{U}(\mathcal{H})/S^1 \,\simeq\, PU(\mathcal{H})

    diff, v7, current

Add your comments
  • Please log in or leave your comment as a "guest post". If commenting as a "guest", please include your name in the message as a courtesy. Note: only certain categories allow guest posts.
  • To produce a hyperlink to an nLab entry, simply put double square brackets around its name, e.g. [[category]]. To use (La)TeX mathematics in your post, make sure Markdown+Itex is selected below and put your mathematics between dollar signs as usual. Only a subset of the usual TeX math commands are accepted: see here for a list.

  • (Help)