Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeMay 19th 2021
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexstarting something -- for the moment just a rough list of references <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/Schur-Weyl+measure/1">v1</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Schur-Weyl+measure">current</a>

   starting something – for the moment just a rough list of references

   v1, current

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeMay 20th 2021
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexbriefly added the definition <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/diff/Schur-Weyl+measure/2">diff</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/Schur-Weyl+measure/2">v2</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Schur-Weyl+measure">current</a>

   briefly added the definition

   diff, v2, current

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeJun 3rd 2021
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexAccording to [p. 3](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1107.1541.pdf#page=3) in [arXiv:1107.1541](https://arxiv.org/abs/1107.1541), a discussion of how the Schur-Weyl measure converges pointwise to the Plancherel measure is given in Section 3 of * [[G. Olshanski]], *Asymptotic representation theory*, Lecture notes 2009 ([webpage](https://lpetrov.cc/art), [pdf](https://storage.lpetrov.cc/Olshanski_ART_course_1.pdf)) Unfortunately for me, these lecture notes are in Russian, and I have trouble even locating the relevant discussion. Can anyone extract it? I'd be interested in knowing the precise statement.

   According to p. 3 in arXiv:1107.1541, a discussion of how the Schur-Weyl measure converges pointwise to the Plancherel measure is given in Section 3 of

   • G. Olshanski, Asymptotic representation theory, Lecture notes 2009 (webpage, pdf)

   Unfortunately for me, these lecture notes are in Russian, and I have trouble even locating the relevant discussion. Can anyone extract it? I’d be interested in knowing the precise statement.