Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration finite foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMay 19th 2021

    starting something

    v1, current

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMay 21st 2021

    added pointer to today’s:

    • Suvankar Dutta, Debangshu Mukherjee, Neetu, Sanhita Parihar, A Unitary Matrix Model for q-deformed Plancherel Growth (arXiv:2105.09342)

    In this paper we construct a unitary matrix model that captures the asymptotic growth of Young diagrams under q-deformed Plancherel measure.

    diff, v2, current

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJun 2nd 2021

    added statement of

    limnpPl({λPart(n)|2nln|sYTableauxλ|n!c<ε})=1.

    from

    diff, v3, current

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorDmitri Pavlov
    • CommentTimeJul 6th 2021

    Added an actual definition:

    Definition

    From a MathOverflow answer by Vadim Alekseev:

    Suppose G is a locally compact group. What one ultimately wants to study is (upon fixing a Haar measure in the noncompact case) the left regular representation λ:GU(L2(G,Haar)). Now, general theory tells us that while it’s not always possible to decompose L2(G) as a direct sum of irreducible reprenentations (this already fails for ), it is always possible to decompose it as a direct integral of irreducible representations (which are parametrised by the unitary dual ˆG of G). Now, if G is unimodular and type I, the direct integral decomposition (with respect to both left and right actions of G) is as follows:

    L2(G)ˆGHπdμ(π),

    where Hπ=ππ*, and its understanding requires, in particular, to determine the measure μ on ˆG such that the above becomes an isometric isomorphism. The unique measure with this property is called the Plancherel measure of G (associated to a given Haar measure). Equivalently, it’s the unique measure such that

    f22=ˆGπ(f)2HSdμ(π),fL1(G,Haar)L2(G,Haar).

    diff, v7, current

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorDmitri Pavlov
    • CommentTimeJul 6th 2021

    And another one:

    From a MathOverflow answer by Cameron Zwarich:

    If G is a unimodular second countable Type I group, then the Plancherel measure is the unique measure μ such that

    f22=ˆGπ(f)2HSdμ(π).

    for every fL1(G)L2(G). This appears as Theorem 18.8.2 in Dixmier’s book on C*-algebras.

    When G is not unimodular, the question becomes more complicated, because the Plancherel measure needs to be twisted by a section of a line bundle; see the paper of Duflo-Moore on the subject for the gory details. When G is not second countable, I do not know of a published result; the technical details of direct integral theory are more difficult in this case and not standard. When G is not Type I, the decomposition of the left regular representation into irreducibles is no longer unique, and some of the operators on the right-hand side of the formula will fail to have finite Hilbert-Schmidt norm.

    The closest analogue to the definition of a Haar measure on abelian locally compact groups as a left-invariant Radon measure is the characterization of the Plancherel measure as a unique co-invariant trace (or weight) on the von Neumann algebra generated by the left-regular representation of G. Suppose G satisfies the same hypotheses as above and Δ:ˉ is the comultiplication on given by λ(s)λ(s)λ(s). Then the Plancherel trace is the unique normal semifinite trace τ on such that

    τ((φid)(Δ(a)))=τ(a)

    for all a+τ and φ*. A similar characterization holds for the Plancherel weight of an arbitrary locally compact group, or for the Haar weight of a locally compact quantum group. For proofs, see volume 2 of Takesaki or any of the literature on von Neumann algebraic quantum groups.

    diff, v7, current