Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJul 12th 2021

    a stub, for the moment just so as to make links work at differential category

    v1, current

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorJ-B Vienney
    • CommentTimeJul 26th 2022

    I start thinking to this page. Just a few words and section titles that I’m going to complete.

    diff, v2, current

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorJ-B Vienney
    • CommentTimeJul 26th 2022

    What are the formulas used in DiLL.

    diff, v3, current

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorJ-B Vienney
    • CommentTimeJul 26th 2022

    More explanations

    diff, v3, current

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorJ-B Vienney
    • CommentTimeJul 26th 2022

    I’ve started categorical semantics.

    diff, v4, current

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorJ-B Vienney
    • CommentTimeAug 8th 2022
    • (edited Aug 8th 2022)

    Page under construction. I’ve just added how to differentiate a proof but I haven’t written what comes before.

    diff, v5, current

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeAug 8th 2022

    Currently the entry says:

    The intuitive understanding of linear logic is difficult to extend to differential linear logic.

    Is that so? Isn’t the intended semantics in differential categories the intuition – in fact the motivation – behind differential linear logic?

    (Maybe it feels like this is a “semantical” and not a “logical” intuition – but to trilogicians, there is no such distinction. ;-)

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorJ-B Vienney
    • CommentTimeAug 8th 2022
    • (edited Aug 8th 2022)

    Yes, you’re right! This is fine for a trilogician. But it’s difficult to make concrete reasoning in differential linear logic, like the “Menu de Lafont” which explains linear logic in terms of the process of eating in a restaurant! You really need to become a trilogician when you go from linear logic to differential linear logic.

    I’m going to add your remark.

    • CommentRowNumber9.
    • CommentAuthorJ-B Vienney
    • CommentTimeAug 8th 2022

    Worked on the page.

    Including some improvment of the idea section.

    diff, v6, current

    • CommentRowNumber10.
    • CommentAuthorJ-B Vienney
    • CommentTimeAug 8th 2022

    Written all the inference rules…

    diff, v6, current

    • CommentRowNumber11.
    • CommentAuthorJ-B Vienney
    • CommentTimeAug 8th 2022

    Added an explanation of the meaning of the cut-elimination and the relation with commuting diagrams in categorical semantics.

    diff, v6, current

  1. fixed minor grammatical typos

    Wilf Offord

    diff, v9, current

  2. The manual redirect is no longer needed

    Empress of Light

    diff, v10, current