Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
   • CommentTimeMay 24th 2010
   • PermaLink
   Author: DavidRoberts
   Format: MarkdownItexAt [[well-order]], the third para of the section 'Definition', the first line is missing the symbol \preceq (in Firefox), as is the first line of the 4th para. Not sure what it is mean to be, but it is discussed in contrast with $\prec$.

   At well-order, the third para of the section ’Definition’, the first line is missing the symbol \preceq (in Firefox), as is the first line of the 4th para. Not sure what it is mean to be, but it is discussed in contrast with $\prec$.

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
   • CommentTimeMay 26th 2010
   • PermaLink
   Author: TobyBartels
   Format: MarkdownItexThe symbol is defined in the second paragraph of that section. It should be `\prec` with an equals sign under it, to mean (roughly) 'precedes or equals'. I can see it on Firefox 3.6 on Windows 7, using the default fonts. (And I'm sure that I've seen it in the past on Firefox 3.0 running under Gnome on Ubuntu 8, both using the default fonts and Deja Vu fonts.) And here it is on the Forum: $$ \preceq $$

   The symbol is defined in the second paragraph of that section. It should be \prec with an equals sign under it, to mean (roughly) ’precedes or equals’.

   I can see it on Firefox 3.6 on Windows 7, using the default fonts. (And I’m sure that I’ve seen it in the past on Firefox 3.0 running under Gnome on Ubuntu 8, both using the default fonts and Deja Vu fonts.)

   And here it is on the Forum:

   $$\preceq$$
3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
   • CommentTimeMay 26th 2010
   • PermaLink
   Author: DavidRoberts
   Format: MarkdownItexThanks, Toby. It's missing in that I can't see it in Firefox 3.0.11 on the system at work (which is far from optimal).It's not here in the forum either, but it's not the end of the world. :)

   Thanks, Toby. It’s missing in that I can’t see it in Firefox 3.0.11 on the system at work (which is far from optimal).It’s not here in the forum either, but it’s not the end of the world. :)