Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below
Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
[deleted]
Also, should idempotent monoids have a unit?
When there is no unit, surely the appropriate terminology is “idempotent magma”.
[deleted]
I agree “idempotent semigroup (object)” seems most suitable when associativity is present. I think “object” can be omitted in this instance, as there ought to be no confusion.
[deleted]
It’s reasonable to redirect idempotent semigroup to this page, even if it’s mainly about idempotent monoids. I don’t see a problem with terminology like semigroupal category, considering we already have magmoidal category and the like.
[deleted]
[deleted]
1 to 10 of 10