Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below
Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
[deleted]
Also, should idempotent monoids have a unit?
When there is no unit, surely the appropriate terminology is “idempotent magma”.
[deleted]
I agree “idempotent semigroup (object)” seems most suitable when associativity is present. I think “object” can be omitted in this instance, as there ought to be no confusion.
[deleted]
It’s reasonable to redirect idempotent semigroup to this page, even if it’s mainly about idempotent monoids. I don’t see a problem with terminology like semigroupal category, considering we already have magmoidal category and the like.
[deleted]
[deleted]
adding redirects for idempotent monoid object
Removed the redirects of idempotent monoid object and idempotent monoid objects from the article and added link to idempotent monoid object which is meant to be about internalizing the algebraic concept.
Pete Sanders
1 to 13 of 13