Not signed in (Sign In)

Start a new discussion

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry beauty bundles calculus categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology combinatorics comma complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive constructive-mathematics cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry differential-topology digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration finite foundations functional-analysis functor galois-theory gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory infinity integration integration-theory k-theory kan lie lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic manifolds mathematics measure-theory modal-logic model model-category-theory monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology newpage nonassociative noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pasting philosophy physics planar pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory subobject superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorAndrew Stacey
    • CommentTimeMay 26th 2010

    I’m splitting this discussion off from the nlab digest one since that shouldn’t get diverted.

    The various recent upgrades to the nForum software have, inevitably, left a few “technical kinks” which it would be nice to get ironed out. If anyone has any remaining irritations, please let me know here, and I’ll try to iron them out.

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorAndrew Stacey
    • CommentTimeMay 26th 2010

    To get started, I’ve fixed Eric’s quoting-maths bug. I can’t (easily) get it quite the same as on the nLab, in that everything works the same in both places, but there’s a “safe” syntax that works the same in both. The key is to ensure that there is a blank line after the quotation - if that is left out, then the two Markdown implementations make different decisions about whether or not the following line is still part of the quotation or not.

    So here’s two different examples that work the same here as on the nLab (view source to see how they’re done):

    Pythagoras said

    a 2+b 2=c 2 a^2 + b^2 = c^2

    But he wasn’t the first.

    Fermat said

    a 2+b 2=c 2 a^2 + b^2 = c^2

    But it took a long time to prove it.

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorHarry Gindi
    • CommentTimeMay 26th 2010
    • (edited May 26th 2010)

    Whatever happened above counts as an kink imo.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorAndrew Stacey
    • CommentTimeMay 26th 2010

    (Sorry, didn’t understand that)

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorHarry Gindi
    • CommentTimeMay 26th 2010

    Uh, the entire post above mine is giving an error:

    This comment is invalid XHTML+MathML+SVG; displaying source.

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorAndrew Stacey
    • CommentTimeMay 27th 2010

    Fixed!

    I didn’t see it because it was a bug with the image rendering of maths (img tags aren’t allowed at block-level) so only shows up in non-MathML browsers. Thanks.

    Any more?

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
    • CommentTimeMay 28th 2010

    Yeah, you quoted Fermat incorrectly. (^_^)

Add your comments
  • Please log in or leave your comment as a "guest post". If commenting as a "guest", please include your name in the message as a courtesy. Note: only certain categories allow guest posts.
  • To produce a hyperlink to an nLab entry, simply put double square brackets around its name, e.g. [[category]]. To use (La)TeX mathematics in your post, make sure Markdown+Itex is selected below and put your mathematics between dollar signs as usual. Only a subset of the usual TeX math commands are accepted: see here for a list.

  • (Help)