Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeOct 28th 2021
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexA stub entry, for the moment just to have a place to record * Haibo Yang, *Equivariant cohomology and sheaves*, Journal of Algebra, **412** 2014, 230-254 ([doi:10.1016/j.jalgebra.2014.05.009](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalgebra.2014.05.009)) I had wanted to extract the main definition and theorem from the article into the entry, but got distracted with editing at *[[good open cover]]* instead, and now am out of time for tonight. More later... <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/equivariant+good+open+cover/1">v1</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/equivariant+good+open+cover">current</a>

   A stub entry, for the moment just to have a place to record

   • Haibo Yang, Equivariant cohomology and sheaves, Journal of Algebra, 412 2014, 230-254 (doi:10.1016/j.jalgebra.2014.05.009)

   I had wanted to extract the main definition and theorem from the article into the entry, but got distracted with editing at good open cover instead, and now am out of time for tonight. More later…

   v1, current

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeNov 11th 2021
   • (edited Nov 11th 2021)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexI have added some lines to the Idea-section, made explicit the notion of "properly equivariant" (good) open covers (my terminology) which restrict to (good) open covers on all suitable fixed loci, and made the claim of existence for smooth $G$-manifolds more explicit (currently stated for finite equivariance groups, but this should hold for all compact Lie groups). <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/diff/equivariant+open+cover/4">diff</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/equivariant+open+cover/4">v4</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/equivariant+open+cover">current</a>

   I have added some lines to the Idea-section, made explicit the notion of “properly equivariant” (good) open covers (my terminology) which restrict to (good) open covers on all suitable fixed loci, and made the claim of existence for smooth $G$-manifolds more explicit (currently stated for finite equivariance groups, but this should hold for all compact Lie groups).

   diff, v4, current

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeNov 14th 2021
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexadded mentioning of the regularity clause ([here](https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/equivariant+open+cover#ProperlyEquivariantOpenCover)) <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/diff/equivariant+open+cover/6">diff</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/equivariant+open+cover/6">v6</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/equivariant+open+cover">current</a>

   added mentioning of the regularity clause (here)

   diff, v6, current