Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeNov 2nd 2021
   • (edited Nov 2nd 2021)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexIn checking for how to best link to this statement from within a proof, I realized that, apparently, there was no real statement recorded anywhere on the $n$Lab. So here a bare minimum, the bare statement with pointer to HTT, just so that I can link to it. <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/groupoid+objects+in+an+%28infinity%2C1%29-topos+are+effective/1">v1</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/groupoid+objects+in+an+%28infinity%2C1%29-topos+are+effective">current</a>

   In checking for how to best link to this statement from within a proof, I realized that, apparently, there was no real statement recorded anywhere on the $n$Lab.

   So here a bare minimum, the bare statement with pointer to HTT, just so that I can link to it.

   v1, current

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeNov 2nd 2021
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItex[ duplicate ] <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/groupoid+objects+in+an+%28%E2%88%9E%2C1%29-topos+are+effective/1">v1</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/groupoid+objects+in+an+%28%E2%88%9E%2C1%29-topos+are+effective">current</a>

   [ duplicate ]

   v1, current

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorHurkyl
   • CommentTimeNov 2nd 2021
   • (edited Nov 2nd 2021)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Hurkyl
   Format: MarkdownItexI added a statement of the corollary that the category of groupoids is equivalent to the category of effective epimorphisms, since I didn't notice a statement elsewhere. Maybe it would be better to put something stating that on the effective epimorphism page, since there isn't an "effective groupoid" page? <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/diff/groupoid+objects+in+an+%28%E2%88%9E%2C1%29-topos+are+effective/2">diff</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/groupoid+objects+in+an+%28%E2%88%9E%2C1%29-topos+are+effective/2">v2</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/groupoid+objects+in+an+%28%E2%88%9E%2C1%29-topos+are+effective">current</a>

   I added a statement of the corollary that the category of groupoids is equivalent to the category of effective epimorphisms, since I didn’t notice a statement elsewhere.

   Maybe it would be better to put something stating that on the effective epimorphism page, since there isn’t an “effective groupoid” page?

   diff, v2, current

4. • CommentRowNumber4.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeNov 2nd 2021
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexThanks. I have rephrased a little in order to display the actual equivalence of $\infty$-categories. Also added pointer to where in HTT this is discussed. Regarding your question: Not sure if I am reading it right but it sounds like you are asking if it would be good to further improve related entries. The answer to that is Yes, always. <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/diff/groupoid+objects+in+an+%28%E2%88%9E%2C1%29-topos+are+effective/3">diff</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/groupoid+objects+in+an+%28%E2%88%9E%2C1%29-topos+are+effective/3">v3</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/groupoid+objects+in+an+%28%E2%88%9E%2C1%29-topos+are+effective">current</a>

   Thanks. I have rephrased a little in order to display the actual equivalence of $\infty$-categories. Also added pointer to where in HTT this is discussed.

   Regarding your question: Not sure if I am reading it right but it sounds like you are asking if it would be good to further improve related entries. The answer to that is Yes, always.

   diff, v3, current

5. • CommentRowNumber5.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeNov 2nd 2021
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexadded the remark ([here](https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/groupoid+objects+in+an+infinity1-topos+are+effective#InterpretationInTermsOfInfinityStacksWithAtlases)) how the theorem recovers the traditional relation between internal groupoids and geometric stacks equipped with atlases (following [p. 27](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2008.01101.pdf#page=27) in [[schreiber:Proper Orbifold Cohomology|SS20]]) <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/diff/groupoid+objects+in+an+%28%E2%88%9E%2C1%29-topos+are+effective/4">diff</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/groupoid+objects+in+an+%28%E2%88%9E%2C1%29-topos+are+effective/4">v4</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/groupoid+objects+in+an+%28%E2%88%9E%2C1%29-topos+are+effective">current</a>

   added the remark (here) how the theorem recovers the traditional relation between internal groupoids and geometric stacks equipped with atlases (following p. 27 in SS20)

   diff, v4, current