Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthornLab edit announcer
   • CommentTimeDec 25th 2021
   • PermaLink
   Author: nLab edit announcer
   Format: MarkdownItexNot sure about the original intention but sure enough that having literally "phi" (I mean, not the greek letter but this combination of three latin letters) is inappropriate Mamuka Jibladze <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/diff/state-field+correspondence/3">diff</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/state-field+correspondence/3">v3</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/state-field+correspondence">current</a>

   Not sure about the original intention but sure enough that having literally “phi” (I mean, not the greek letter but this combination of three latin letters) is inappropriate

   Mamuka Jibladze

   diff, v3, current

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeDec 25th 2021
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexThanks. I wasn't aware of the existence of this entry. I see that we also have *[[state-operator correspondence]]* redirecting to *[[Reeh-Schlieder theorem]]*. All this would deserve to be clarified, expanded and harmonized. I won't do it now, but I have at least added some textbook references on the state-field correspondence: * [[Paul Ginsparg]], Section 3.4 in: *Applied Conformal Field Theory*, lectures at: *[Fields, strings, critical phenomena, Les Houche Summer School 1988](https://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:21047524)*([arXiv:hep-th/9108028](https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9108028)) * [[Martin Schottenloher]], Rem. 9. 11 in: *Foundations of Two-Dimensional Conformal Quantum Field Theory* ([pdf](https://www.mathematik.uni-muenchen.de/~schotten/LNP-cft-pdf/09_978-3-540-68625-5_Ch09_23-08-08.pdf)), chapter 9 in: *A Mathematical Introduction to Conformal Field Theory*, Lecture Notes in Physics, Springer 2008 ([doi:10.1007/978-3-540-68628-6](https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-540-68628-6), [web](https://www.mathematik.uni-muenchen.de/~schotten/LNP-cft-pdf/)) <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/diff/state-field+correspondence/4">diff</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/state-field+correspondence/4">v4</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/state-field+correspondence">current</a>

   Thanks. I wasn’t aware of the existence of this entry.

   I see that we also have state-operator correspondence redirecting to Reeh-Schlieder theorem.

   All this would deserve to be clarified, expanded and harmonized.

   I won’t do it now, but I have at least added some textbook references on the state-field correspondence:

   • Paul Ginsparg, Section 3.4 in: Applied Conformal Field Theory, lectures at: Fields, strings, critical phenomena, Les Houche Summer School 1988(arXiv:hep-th/9108028)

   • Martin Schottenloher, Rem. 9. 11 in: Foundations of Two-Dimensional Conformal Quantum Field Theory (pdf), chapter 9 in: A Mathematical Introduction to Conformal Field Theory, Lecture Notes in Physics, Springer 2008 (doi:10.1007/978-3-540-68628-6, web)

   diff, v4, current