Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf sheaves simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).

nLab > nLab General Discussions: nLab and funding agencies question

Bottom of Page

1 to 1 of 1

  1.  
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorIan_Durham
    • CommentTimeJun 2nd 2010
    • (edited Jun 2nd 2010)
    I know a lot of you are not US-based, so you may not know the answer to this question, but something quirky just came up and I was wondering if anyone had had experience with it before in relation to the nLab.

    So, all the colleges and universities in the state of New Hampshire (Dartmouth, U. of New Hampshire, Saint Anselm, Franklin Pierce, etc.) are putting together a massive grant proposal for the National Science Foundation (NSF). It's complicated to explain the details, but suffice it to say I'm going to end up as a PI or Co-PI on a couple of sub-projects. The NSF requires this very specific "biosketch" of all major participants and in the list of requirements is the following:

    Collaborators and Co-Editors. A list of all persons in alphabetical order (including their current organizational affiliations) who are currently, or who have been collaborators or co-authors with the individual on a project, book, article, report, abstract or paper during the 48 months preceding the submission of the proposal. Also include those individuals who are currently or have been co-editors of a journal, compendium, or conference proceedings during the 24 months preceding the submission of the proposal. If there are no collaborators or co-editors to report, this should be so indicated.



    Clearly the typical wiki wouldn't fall under the above. But the nLab is different. It's clearly more like a compendium or project and individual entries can take on the status of articles. Since it's still a wiki, though, it is impossible to list all of one's "collaborators" or "co-authors." In my mind the NSF ought to make allowances for such things in the future (and, in fact, I tossed it in anyway) just as they will need, at some point, to acknowledge that in some sub-fields peer-review is either dying a slow death or evolving away from the typical print journals.

    So my question is, has anyone had any experience with trying to get a funding agency to recognize the nLab as more than just a typical wiki? I'm sure journal editors will be easier to convince so I'm really interested in how the bureaucrats are viewing this endeavor (if they even know it exists).

1 to 1 of 1

  1.