Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorHarry Gindi
   • CommentTimeJun 2nd 2010
   • (edited Jun 2nd 2010)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Harry Gindi
   Format: MarkdownItexIn Cisinski's [book](http://www-math.univ-paris13.fr/~cisinski/ast.pdf), I'm having trouble understanding what Lemma 1.1.6a is saying, because he refers to the different faces of the cube as lateral, horizontal, horizontal superieur, horizontal inferieur, oblique, etc. Could someone who knows what it's supposed to say, that is, translate the statement of part a.) and the proof (only a paragraph long)? I'd type it out, but the diagram is necessary.

   In Cisinski’s book, I’m having trouble understanding what Lemma 1.1.6a is saying, because he refers to the different faces of the cube as lateral, horizontal, horizontal superieur, horizontal inferieur, oblique, etc.

   Could someone who knows what it’s supposed to say, that is, translate the statement of part a.) and the proof (only a paragraph long)?

   I’d type it out, but the diagram is necessary.

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
   • CommentTimeJun 2nd 2010
   • PermaLink
   Author: DavidRoberts
   Format: MarkdownItexhere's a crack - my French is terrible: Let C be a category admitting inductive limits, and F a class of arrows of C a)If the class F is stable under direct images, for every commutative diagram, blah if the horizontal faces are cocartesian [i.e. pushouts], if the arrow $k:X_1\amalg_{X_0} Y_0 \to Y_1$ is in F, then so is $l:X\amalg_{X_2} Y_2 \to Y$. Proof: We start by forming the following commutative diagram blah The upper horizontal square, (as well as?) the two lateral squares of the cube are cocartesian, and then so is the lower horizontal square. The oblique square is also cocartesian, and then so is the face of the prism (not sure about that last clause) to be continued... Or someone else can do a better job :)

   here’s a crack - my French is terrible:

   Let C be a category admitting inductive limits, and F a class of arrows of C

   a)If the class F is stable under direct images, for every commutative diagram,

   blah

   if the horizontal faces are cocartesian [i.e. pushouts], if the arrow $k:X_1\amalg_{X_0} Y_0 \to Y_1$ is in F, then so is $l:X\amalg_{X_2} Y_2 \to Y$.

   Proof: We start by forming the following commutative diagram

   blah

   The upper horizontal square, (as well as?) the two lateral squares of the cube are cocartesian, and then so is the lower horizontal square. The oblique square is also cocartesian, and then so is the face of the prism (not sure about that last clause)

   to be continued… Or someone else can do a better job :)

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorHarry Gindi
   • CommentTimeJun 2nd 2010
   • (edited Jun 2nd 2010)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Harry Gindi
   Format: MarkdownItexWhich squares are horizontal? The front and back ones, or the front, back, top, and bottom ones? Also, which square is oblique, and which ones are lateral? Edit: Nevermind. I've got it.

   Which squares are horizontal? The front and back ones, or the front, back, top, and bottom ones? Also, which square is oblique, and which ones are lateral?

   Edit: Nevermind. I’ve got it.